These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2638068)
21. Posterior esthetic dentistry--a perspective for the new century. Neuman KA J Can Dent Assoc; 1999 Nov; 65(10):556-7. PubMed ID: 10612932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options. Lyons K; N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Effects of different class II cavity designs on stresses in restoration]. Xu X; Sun Z; Tao L; Xiong H Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 37(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 12641960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations. Cötert HS; Sen BH; Balkan M Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 11508095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness. Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Lee MR; Cho BH; Son HH; Um CM; Lee IB Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 16530819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Inlays with porcelain on gold. Indications and contraindications with special reference to Class Ii cavities in upper premolars and molars]. Preda GE Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1979; 20(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 299268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems. Haj-Ali R; Walker MP; Williams K Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bioaesthetic ceromer restorations for the replacement of existing posterior amalgam restorations. Ahmad I Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):416-8, 420. PubMed ID: 9655048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]