These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

528 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26381204)

  • 1. mapDIA: Preprocessing and statistical analysis of quantitative proteomics data from data independent acquisition mass spectrometry.
    Teo G; Kim S; Tsou CC; Collins B; Gingras AC; Nesvizhskii AI; Choi H
    J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():108-120. PubMed ID: 26381204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative analysis of statistical methods used for detecting differential expression in label-free mass spectrometry proteomics.
    Langley SR; Mayr M
    J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():83-92. PubMed ID: 26193490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. QPROT: Statistical method for testing differential expression using protein-level intensity data in label-free quantitative proteomics.
    Choi H; Kim S; Fermin D; Tsou CC; Nesvizhskii AI
    J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():121-126. PubMed ID: 26254008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data Independent Acquisition analysis in ProHits 4.0.
    Liu G; Knight JD; Zhang JP; Tsou CC; Wang J; Lambert JP; Larsen B; Tyers M; Raught B; Bandeira N; Nesvizhskii AI; Choi H; Gingras AC
    J Proteomics; 2016 Oct; 149():64-68. PubMed ID: 27132685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ProteinInferencer: Confident protein identification and multiple experiment comparison for large scale proteomics projects.
    Zhang Y; Xu T; Shan B; Hart J; Aslanian A; Han X; Zong N; Li H; Choi H; Wang D; Acharya L; Du L; Vogt PK; Ping P; Yates JR
    J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():25-32. PubMed ID: 26196237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EBprot: Statistical analysis of labeling-based quantitative proteomics data.
    Koh HW; Swa HL; Fermin D; Ler SG; Gunaratne J; Choi H
    Proteomics; 2015 Aug; 15(15):2580-91. PubMed ID: 25913743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiplexed and data-independent tandem mass spectrometry for global proteome profiling.
    Chapman JD; Goodlett DR; Masselon CD
    Mass Spectrom Rev; 2014; 33(6):452-70. PubMed ID: 24281846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DIA-Umpire: comprehensive computational framework for data-independent acquisition proteomics.
    Tsou CC; Avtonomov D; Larsen B; Tucholska M; Choi H; Gingras AC; Nesvizhskii AI
    Nat Methods; 2015 Mar; 12(3):258-64, 7 p following 264. PubMed ID: 25599550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multi-model statistical approach for proteomic spectral count quantitation.
    Branson OE; Freitas MA
    J Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 144():23-32. PubMed ID: 27260494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Analyses of Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometric Approaches: DIA, WiSIM-DIA, and Untargeted DIA.
    Koopmans F; Ho JTC; Smit AB; Li KW
    Proteomics; 2018 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 29134766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments.
    Choi M; Chang CY; Clough T; Broudy D; Killeen T; MacLean B; Vitek O
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):2524-6. PubMed ID: 24794931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approaches for systematic proteome exploration.
    Falk R; Ramström M; Ståhl S; Hober S
    Biomol Eng; 2007 Jun; 24(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 17376740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and analysis of quantitative differential proteomics investigations using LC-MS technology.
    Bukhman YV; Dharsee M; Ewing R; Chu P; Topaloglou T; Le Bihan T; Goh T; Duewel H; Stewart II; Wisniewski JR; Ng NF
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2008 Feb; 6(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 18324749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre- and post-processing workflow for affinity purification mass spectrometry data.
    Fischer M; Zilkenat S; Gerlach RG; Wagner S; Renard BY
    J Proteome Res; 2014 May; 13(5):2239-49. PubMed ID: 24641689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A scoring model for phosphopeptide site localization and its impact on the question of whether to use MSA.
    Fischer JSDG; Dos Santos MDM; Marchini FK; Barbosa VC; Carvalho PC; Zanchin NIT
    J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():42-50. PubMed ID: 25623781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current trends in computational inference from mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
    Webb-Robertson BJ; Cannon WR
    Brief Bioinform; 2007 Sep; 8(5):304-17. PubMed ID: 17584764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein Biomarker Discovery in Non-depleted Serum by Spectral Library-Based Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry.
    Kraut A; Louwagie M; Bruley C; Masselon C; Couté Y; Brun V; Hesse AM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1959():129-150. PubMed ID: 30852820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics.
    Mallick P; Schirle M; Chen SS; Flory MR; Lee H; Martin D; Ranish J; Raught B; Schmitt R; Werner T; Kuster B; Aebersold R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 17195840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using cross-correlation normalized for peptide length to optimize peptide identification in shotgun proteomics.
    Yang B; Ying W; Gong Y; Zhang Y; Cai Y; Dong H; Qian X
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2005; 19(20):2983-5. PubMed ID: 16178048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phosphoproteomics by mass spectrometry and classical protein chemistry approaches.
    Salih E
    Mass Spectrom Rev; 2005; 24(6):828-46. PubMed ID: 15538747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.