205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26381235)
1. An ensemble approach to accurately detect somatic mutations using SomaticSeq.
Fang LT; Afshar PT; Chhibber A; Mohiyuddin M; Fan Y; Mu JC; Gibeling G; Barr S; Asadi NB; Gerstein MB; Koboldt DC; Wang W; Wong WH; Lam HY
Genome Biol; 2015 Sep; 16(1):197. PubMed ID: 26381235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SomaticSeq: An Ensemble and Machine Learning Method to Detect Somatic Mutations.
Fang LT
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2120():47-70. PubMed ID: 32124311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ensemble-Based Somatic Mutation Calling in Cancer Genomes.
Huang W; Guo YA; Chang MM; Skanderup AJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2120():37-46. PubMed ID: 32124310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep convolutional neural networks for accurate somatic mutation detection.
Sahraeian SME; Liu R; Lau B; Podesta K; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HYK
Nat Commun; 2019 Mar; 10(1):1041. PubMed ID: 30833567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A deep learning approach to automate refinement of somatic variant calling from cancer sequencing data.
Ainscough BJ; Barnell EK; Ronning P; Campbell KM; Wagner AH; Fehniger TA; Dunn GP; Uppaluri R; Govindan R; Rohan TE; Griffith M; Mardis ER; Swamidass SJ; Griffith OL
Nat Genet; 2018 Dec; 50(12):1735-1743. PubMed ID: 30397337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine learning random forest for predicting oncosomatic variant NGS analysis.
Pellegrino E; Jacques C; Beaufils N; Nanni I; Carlioz A; Metellus P; Ouafik L
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21820. PubMed ID: 34750410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accurate Ensemble Prediction of Somatic Mutations with SMuRF2.
Huang W; Sim NL; Skanderup AJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2493():53-66. PubMed ID: 35751808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA.
Kockan C; Hach F; Sarrafi I; Bell RH; McConeghy B; Beja K; Haegert A; Wyatt AW; Volik SV; Chi KN; Collins CC; Sahinalp SC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 27531099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indel variant analysis of short-read sequencing data with Scalpel.
Fang H; Bergmann EA; Arora K; Vacic V; Zody MC; Iossifov I; O'Rawe JA; Wu Y; Jimenez Barron LT; Rosenbaum J; Ronemus M; Lee YH; Wang Z; Dikoglu E; Jobanputra V; Lyon GJ; Wigler M; Schatz MC; Narzisi G
Nat Protoc; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2529-2548. PubMed ID: 27854363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ISOWN: accurate somatic mutation identification in the absence of normal tissue controls.
Kalatskaya I; Trinh QM; Spears M; McPherson JD; Bartlett JMS; Stein L
Genome Med; 2017 Jun; 9(1):59. PubMed ID: 28659176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation and optimisation of indel detection workflows for ion torrent sequencing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
Yeo ZX; Wong JC; Rozen SG; Lee AS
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):516. PubMed ID: 24962530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DeepSSV: detecting somatic small variants in paired tumor and normal sequencing data with convolutional neural network.
Meng J; Victor B; He Z; Liu H; Jiang T
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33164053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. INDELseek: detection of complex insertions and deletions from next-generation sequencing data.
Au CH; Leung AY; Kwong A; Chan TL; Ma ES
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28056804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining calls from multiple somatic mutation-callers.
Kim SY; Jacob L; Speed TP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 May; 15():154. PubMed ID: 24885750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cancer cell-line titration series for evaluating somatic classification.
Denroche RE; Mullen L; Timms L; Beck T; Yung CK; Stein L; McPherson JD; Brown AM
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Dec; 8():823. PubMed ID: 26708082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. NeoMutate: an ensemble machine learning framework for the prediction of somatic mutations in cancer.
Anzar I; Sverchkova A; Stratford R; Clancy T
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 May; 12(1):63. PubMed ID: 31096972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Capreomycin resistance prediction in two species of Mycobacterium using a stacked ensemble method.
Chowdhury AS; Khaledian E; Broschat SL
J Appl Microbiol; 2019 Dec; 127(6):1656-1664. PubMed ID: 31419358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
