177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26381261)
1. Performance of principal scores to estimate the marginal compliers causal effect of an intervention.
Porcher R; Leyrat C; Baron G; Giraudeau B; Boutron I
Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(5):752-67. PubMed ID: 26381261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the use of propensity scores in principal causal effect estimation.
Jo B; Stuart EA
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(23):2857-75. PubMed ID: 19610131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3078-94. PubMed ID: 17187347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation and inference for the causal effect of receiving treatment on a multinomial outcome.
Cheng J
Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 18373714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simple efficient bias corrected instrumental variable estimator for randomized trials with noncompliance.
Chan KC
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):786-93. PubMed ID: 22484340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal mean weighting through stratification: a generalized method for evaluating multivalued and multiple treatments with nonexperimental data.
Hong G
Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 21843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks.
Austin PC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):537-45. PubMed ID: 18471657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Causal mediation analysis with multiple mediators in the presence of treatment noncompliance.
Park S; Kürüm E
Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1810-1829. PubMed ID: 29542166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bias analysis of the instrumental variable estimator as an estimator of the average causal effect.
Chiba Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Jan; 31(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19879376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating causal effects from a randomized clinical trial when noncompliance is measured with error.
Boatman JA; Vock DM; Koopmeiners JS; Donny EC
Biostatistics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):103-118. PubMed ID: 28605411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Principal stratification with predictors of compliance for randomized trials with 2 active treatments.
Roy J; Hogan JW; Marcus BH
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 17681993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the sensitivity of methods for estimating principal causal effects.
Stuart EA; Jo B
Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):657-74. PubMed ID: 21971481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A causal model for longitudinal randomised trials with time-dependent non-compliance.
Becque T; White IR; Haggard M
Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(12):2019-34. PubMed ID: 25778798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity analysis for principal ignorability violation in estimating complier and noncomplier average causal effects.
Nguyen TQ; Stuart EA; Scharfstein DO; Ogburn EL
Stat Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38890728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model misspecification sensitivity analysis in estimating causal effects of interventions with non-compliance.
Jo B
Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3161-81. PubMed ID: 12375297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A principal stratification approach for evaluating natural direct and indirect effects in the presence of treatment-induced intermediate confounding.
Taguri M; Chiba Y
Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 25312003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Causal models for randomized trials with two active treatments and continuous compliance.
Ma Y; Roy J; Marcus B
Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(19):2349-62. PubMed ID: 21751229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
