317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2638168)
1. [Cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of the treatment results of Class II division 1 obtained by elastic activator].
Demirović D; Filipović M
Bilt Udruz Ortodonata Jugosl; 1989; 22(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2638168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric changes in Angle Class II treatment.
Fischer-Brandies H
Int J Orthod; 1989; 27(3-4):9-13. PubMed ID: 2592152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Treatment of a basal and dental Class II malocclusion in mixed dentition, with functional appliances and extraoral traction].
Viora E; Mossino ML; Ramirez Velarde JC; Guglielmino D
Minerva Ortognatod; 1989; 7(3-4):117-32. PubMed ID: 2640572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Interception of a Class 2 division 1 malocclusion using mandibular hyperpropulsion. Cephalometric results].
Rochon G
Inf Dent; 1986 Dec; 68(43):4397-401. PubMed ID: 3470257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cephalometric evaluation of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion cases treated with the Bimler appliance].
Calegari MA; Petrelli E; Rodrigues AM
Dens (Curitiba); 1990; 6(1-2):16-24. PubMed ID: 2131271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
Schiavoni R
Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cephalometric markers to consider in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the bionator.
Ahn SJ; Kim JT; Nahm DS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):578-86. PubMed ID: 11395700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Mandibular propulsion in the treatment of Class II division I by activators: comparison with growth predictions].
Bonnefont R; Charron C
Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1979 Jan; 13(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 394264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The Bimzat skeletal activator in the treatment of Angle Class I, II and III malocclusions in the mixed dentition].
Genone B
Dent Cadmos; 1985 Dec; 53(20):17-25, 29-32, 35-9 passim. PubMed ID: 3869560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of Class II, division 1, cases with a maxillary traction splint.
Seçkin O; Surucu R
Quintessence Int; 1990 Mar; 21(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 2374804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A case report: occlusal guidance of Angle Class II malocclusion with dysfunction of the masticatory system].
Ogihara K; Uehara M; Itoh N; Mizorogi E; Suzuki K; Kaneko T
Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi; 1989; 27(4):1025-34. PubMed ID: 2489888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
