220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26381962)
1. NIH disclosure rules falter.
Reardon S
Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7569):300-1. PubMed ID: 26381962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. conflict regulations. Scientists sue to halt financial disclosure rule.
Kaiser J
Science; 2012 Aug; 337(6095):632. PubMed ID: 22879474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Accountable and transparent.
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7414):5. PubMed ID: 22955581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. NIH set to tighten financial rules for researchers.
Wadman M
Nature; 2010 May; 465(7297):407. PubMed ID: 20505703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. NIH will restrict outside income: tighter rules address concerns about conflicts of interest.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 2005 Feb; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 15700372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. National Institutes of Health enacts final ethics regulations.
Ness AC
J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 17111527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NIH workers see red over revised rules for conflicts of interest.
Wadman M
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):3-4. PubMed ID: 15744256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Gone fishing.
Nature; 2015 Mar; 519(7541):5. PubMed ID: 25739591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Universities fear repercussions as NIH tunes conflicts policy.
Check E
Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7010):725. PubMed ID: 15483566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Researcher wins the battle but loses the war.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Apr; 20(4):8. PubMed ID: 16018117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutes in pharma cash probe.
Ledford H
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):963. PubMed ID: 18563109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Review cites ethical lapses by scientists.
McNeil DG
N Y Times Web; 2005 Jul; ():A15. PubMed ID: 16060022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Researcher said his colleague should have revealed possible conflicts of interest.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jan; 20(1):8. PubMed ID: 15810184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Postdocs slam zealous attitude of NIH ethics office.
Dalton R
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7034):687. PubMed ID: 15815596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Agency scientists divided over ethics ban on consulting.
Harris G
N Y Times Web; 2005 Feb; ():A17. PubMed ID: 15700373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH told to provide records in conflict of interest probe.
McCarthy M
Lancet; 2003 Dec; 362(9401):2076. PubMed ID: 14700069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Strict NIH ethics rules provoke mixed response from scientists.
Ready T
Nat Med; 2005 Mar; 11(3):238. PubMed ID: 15746921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reversal of fortune.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2005 Feb; 433(7026):663. PubMed ID: 15703753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lawmakers examine the possibility of favoritism in a $40-million NIH contract with Harvard.
Brainard J
Chron High Educ; 2003 Nov; 50(13):A19. PubMed ID: 15287136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conflicts of interest in medical research: how much conflict should exceed legal boundaries?
Klanica K
J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(3):37-45. PubMed ID: 16459426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
