These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2638252)

  • 1. ["Characterized" removable orthodontic appliances].
    Maiolani S
    Dent Cadmos; 1989 Sep; 57(14):107-13. PubMed ID: 2638252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cooperation in wearing orthodontic appliances].
    Remmelink HJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jul; 102(7):254-7. PubMed ID: 11837108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
    Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Motivational aids in orthodontic treatment with removable appliances].
    Melica VM
    Dent Cadmos; 1989 Feb; 57(3):87-8. PubMed ID: 2636168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The hidden power (and charm) of the Witzig winner speech.
    Spahl TJ
    Funct Orthod; 2003; 20(1-2):40-4. PubMed ID: 14558150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cooperation and therapeutic effect in overcompensated activator].
    Herren P
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1983; 71(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 6222568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical properties of root cementum: Part 10. Comparison of the effects of invisible removable thermoplastic appliances with light and heavy orthodontic forces on premolar cementum. A microcomputed-tomography study.
    Barbagallo LJ; Jones AS; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 18249288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying patient adherence during active orthodontic treatment with removable appliances using microelectronic wear-time documentation.
    Schäfer K; Ludwig B; Meyer-Gutknecht H; Schott TC
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24993614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of orthodontic appliances on sleep quality.
    Rawji A; Parker L; Deb P; Woodside D; Tompson B; Shapiro CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):606-14. PubMed ID: 18984392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How patient-selected colors for removable appliances are reflected in electronically tracked compliance (wear times and wear behavior).
    Schott TC; Menne D
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Jul; 88(4):458-464. PubMed ID: 29583018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Use of Microsensors to Assess the Daily Wear Time of Removable Orthodontic Appliances: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Nahajowski M; Lis J; Sarul M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of oral and orthodontic appliance hygiene in orthodontically treated patients].
    Wites M; Panuszka J; Dyras M
    Przegl Lek; 2003; 60 Suppl 6():126-8. PubMed ID: 15106476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient cooperation in treatment with removable appliances: a model of patient noncompliance with treatment implications.
    Gross AM; Samson G; Dierkes M
    Am J Orthod; 1985 May; 87(5):392-7. PubMed ID: 3857864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objectively measured patient cooperation during early orthodontic treatment: Does psychology have an impact?
    Sarul M; Lewandowska B; Kawala B; Kozanecka A; Antoszewska-Smith J
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2017 Nov; 26(8):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 29264882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-perception of smile attractiveness as a reliable predictor of increased patient compliance with an orthodontist.
    Sarul M; Antoszewska-Smith J; Park HS
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1633-1638. PubMed ID: 31778599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Objective assessment of patient cooperation during orthodontic treatment].
    Farcnik F; Rudel D
    Zobozdrav Vestn; 1982; 37(3-4):89-93. PubMed ID: 6961621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a contingency contracting procedure on patient compliance with removable retention.
    Gross AM; Schwartz CL; Kellum GD; Bishop FW
    J Clin Orthod; 1991 May; 25(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 1939629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Epidemiology of non-compliance in orthodontic case histories].
    Lapter V; Kulcar Z; Kunst M; Plese D; Gazi-Coklica V
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 1982; 16(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 6960675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Are removable appliances obsolete?].
    de Pauw G; Derweduwen K; Dermaut L
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Apr; 107(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 11382971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Treatment needs with fixed and removable orthodontic appliances].
    Stefková M
    Prakt Zubn Lek; 1984 May; 32(4):117-21. PubMed ID: 6591163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.