These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26382665)

  • 1. Mechanism-Based QSAR Modeling of Skin Sensitization.
    Dearden JC; Hewitt M; Roberts DW; Enoch SJ; Rowe PH; Przybylak KR; Vaughan-Williams GD; Smith ML; Pillai GG; Katritzky AR
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2015 Oct; 28(10):1975-86. PubMed ID: 26382665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of regression-based QSAR models for quantification of contributions of molecular fragments to skin sensitization potency of diverse organic chemicals.
    Nandy A; Kar S; Roy K
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(12):1009-23. PubMed ID: 23988224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.
    Alves VM; Muratov E; Fourches D; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Andrade CH; Tropsha A
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 284(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 25560674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a QSAR model for acute toxicity.
    Pavan M; Netzeva TI; Worth AP
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):147-71. PubMed ID: 16644555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part II: QSAR models of skin permeability and the relationships between skin permeability and skin sensitization.
    Alves VM; Muratov E; Fourches D; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Andrade CH; Tropsha A
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 284(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 25560673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skin sensitization: modeling based on skin metabolism simulation and formation of protein conjugates.
    Dimitrov SD; Low LK; Patlewicz GY; Kern PS; Dimitrova GD; Comber MH; Phillips RD; Niemela J; Bailey PT; Mekenyan OG
    Int J Toxicol; 2005; 24(4):189-204. PubMed ID: 16126613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of skin irritation from organic chemicals using membrane-interaction QSAR analysis.
    Kodithala K; Hopfinger AJ; Thompson ED; Robinson MK
    Toxicol Sci; 2002 Apr; 66(2):336-46. PubMed ID: 11896301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Convenient QSAR model for predicting the complexation of structurally diverse compounds with beta-cyclodextrins.
    Pérez-Garrido A; Morales Helguera A; Abellán Guillén A; Cordeiro MN; Garrido Escudero A
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2009 Jan; 17(2):896-904. PubMed ID: 19056282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QNA-based 'Star Track' QSAR approach.
    Filimonov DA; Zakharov AV; Lagunin AA; Poroikov VV
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009 Oct; 20(7-8):679-709. PubMed ID: 20024804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A QSAR investigation of dermal and respiratory chemical sensitizers based on computational chemistry properties.
    Warne MA; Nicholson JK; Lindon JC; Guiney PD; Gartland KP
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009 Jul; 20(5-6):429-51. PubMed ID: 19916108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relating skin sensitizing potency to chemical reactivity: reactive Michael acceptors inhibit NF-κB signaling and are less sensitizing than S(N)Ar- and S(N)2- reactive chemicals.
    Natsch A; Haupt T; Laue H
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Nov; 24(11):2018-27. PubMed ID: 22023385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
    Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. QSAR model as a random event: A case of rat toxicity.
    Toropova AP; Toropov AA; Benfenati E; Leszczynska D; Leszczynski J
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2015 Mar; 23(6):1223-30. PubMed ID: 25703247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative and mechanistic read across for predicting the skin sensitization potential of alkenes acting via Michael addition.
    Enoch SJ; Cronin MT; Schultz TW; Madden JC
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 18189367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a local lymph node assay dataset for skin sensitization.
    Roberts DW; Patlewicz G; Kern PS; Gerberick F; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Ryan CA; Basketter DA; Aptula AO
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2007 Jul; 20(7):1019-30. PubMed ID: 17555332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First report on development of quantitative interspecies structure-carcinogenicity relationship models and exploring discriminatory features for rodent carcinogenicity of diverse organic chemicals using OECD guidelines.
    Kar S; Roy K
    Chemosphere; 2012 Apr; 87(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 22225702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical external validation and consensus modeling: a QSPR case study for Koc prediction.
    Gramatica P; Giani E; Papa E
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Mar; 25(6):755-66. PubMed ID: 16890002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanistic category formation for the prediction of respiratory sensitization.
    Enoch SJ; Roberts DW; Cronin MT
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2010 Oct; 23(10):1547-55. PubMed ID: 20677741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. QSAR modeling of cumulative environmental end-points for the prioritization of hazardous chemicals.
    Gramatica P; Papa E; Sangion A
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 29226926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of skin penetration processes of organic molecules using molecular similarity and QSAR analysis.
    Santos-Filho OA; Hopfinger AJ; Zheng T
    Mol Pharm; 2004; 1(6):466-76. PubMed ID: 16028358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.