628 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26383027)
21. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. DIR-DBTnet: Deep iterative reconstruction network for three-dimensional digital breast tomosynthesis imaging.
Su T; Deng X; Yang J; Wang Z; Fang S; Zheng H; Liang D; Ge Y
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2289-2300. PubMed ID: 33594671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of time-efficient reconstruction methods in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Svahn TM; Houssami N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):331-6. PubMed ID: 25855075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction.
Garrett JW; Li Y; Li K; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2009-2022. PubMed ID: 29542821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver.
Baker ME; Dong F; Primak A; Obuchowski NA; Einstein D; Gandhi N; Herts BR; Purysko A; Remer E; Vachhani N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 22733888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study.
Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of a denoising convolutional neural network-based algorithm for metal artifact reduction in digital tomosynthesis for arthroplasty: A phantom study.
Gomi T; Sakai R; Hara H; Watanabe Y; Mizukami S
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222406. PubMed ID: 31518374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multigrid reconstruction with block-iterative updates for breast tomosynthesis.
Michielsen K; Nuyts J
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6537-48. PubMed ID: 26520744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms.
Shin CI; Kim SH; Lee ES; Lee DH; Hwang EJ; Chung SY; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):759-71. PubMed ID: 25010640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A software-based x-ray scatter correction method for breast tomosynthesis.
Jia Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6643-53. PubMed ID: 22149846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET.
Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of a new image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis: effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.
Krammer J; Zolotarev S; Hillman I; Karalis K; Stsepankou D; Vengrinovich V; Hesser J; M Svahn T
Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190345. PubMed ID: 31453718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Influence of Image Reconstruction Method on Image Quality in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis].
Nishikawa M; Tominaga K; Ueno T; Yasukawa S; Hiroshige K; Mouri K; Kozawa Y; Uemura T; Fujimitsu R; Yoshimitsu K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 33473075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique.
McCollough CH; Leng S; Sunnegardh J; Vrieze TJ; Yu L; Lane J; Raupach R; Stierstorfer K; Flohr T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061904. PubMed ID: 23718595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
