These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Device stability and quality of ventilation of classic laryngeal mask airway versus AIR-Q and I-gel at different head and neck positions in anesthetized spontaneously breathing children. Abdel-Ghaffar HS; Abdelal FA; Osman MA; Soliman OM Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Mar; 86(3):286-294. PubMed ID: 31922375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population. Gupta S; Dogra N; Chauhan K Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(3):647-650. PubMed ID: 28928564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices. Park SH; Han SH; Do SH; Kim JW; Kim JH Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 19095838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial. Banerjee G; Jain D; Bala I; Gandhi K; Samujh R Indian J Anaesth; 2018 Feb; 62(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 29491514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flexion compromises ventilation with the laryngeal tube suction II in children. Kim JT; Na HS; Bae JY; Kim HJ; Shin HY; Kim HS; Kim CS; Kim SD Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Feb; 19(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19143960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Head Rotation Reduces Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™ in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Trial. Chaki T; Tachibana S; Kumita S; Sato H; Hamada K; Tokinaga Y; Yamakage M Anesth Analg; 2021 Mar; 132(3):818-826. PubMed ID: 32889846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway. Keller C; Brimacombe J Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of head and neck position on performance of the Ambu® AuraGain™ laryngeal mask: a randomized crossover study. Yoo S; Park SK; Kim WH; Hur M; Bahk JH; Lim YJ; Kim JT Minerva Anestesiol; 2019 Feb; 85(2):133-138. PubMed ID: 29589419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway. López-Gil M; Mantilla I; Blanco T; Teigell E; Hervias M; Fernández-López R Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 22295870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure. Somri M; Vaida S; Garcia Fornari G; Mendoza GR; Charco-Mora P; Hawash N; Matter I; Swaid F; Gaitini L BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 27716165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique™ and the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children. Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Mankoo R; Langen KE; Mandler T Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Feb; 22(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 21917058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children. Jagannathan N; Sommers K; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Shah RD; Mukherji II; Miller S; Voronov P; Seraphin S Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Feb; 23(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23189931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients. Joly N; Poulin LP; Tanoubi I; Drolet P; Donati F; St-Pierre P Can J Anaesth; 2014 Sep; 61(9):794-800. PubMed ID: 25141831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of glottic view through Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in the supine and lateral position and assessing it as a conduit for blind endotracheal intubation in children in the supine position. Pandey RK; Subramanium RK; Darlong V; Lekha C; Garg R; Punj J; Rewari V; Bajpai M Paediatr Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 25(12):1241-7. PubMed ID: 26417722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fiberoptic intubation of severely obese patients through supraglottic airway: A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Dave MH; Bruppacher HR Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Feb; 63(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 30088266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Chang JE; Kim H; Lee JM; Min SW; Won D; Jun K; Hwang JY BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31272379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. i-gel™ vs. AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask for general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation in paralyzed patients. Donaldson W; Abraham A; Deighan M; Michalek P Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2011 Jun; 155(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 21804625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]