258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26384460)
1. Radial versus femoral access in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome in the post-matrix era: Still one size does not fit all.
Escárcega RO; Baker NC; Lipinski MJ; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015; 16(7):435-6. PubMed ID: 26384460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-MATRIX).
Sciahbasi A; Calabrò P; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Tomassini F; Sardella G; Zavalloni D; Cortese B; Limbruno U; Tebaldi M; Gagnor A; Rubartelli P; Zingarelli A; Valgimigli M
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 24746599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of Radial Versus Femoral Access in the Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is it the Operator or the Operation That Matters?
Le May MR; Singh K; Wells GA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Sep; 8(11):1405-1409. PubMed ID: 26404191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Ferrante G; Rao SV; Jüni P; Da Costa BR; Reimers B; Condorelli G; Anzuini A; Jolly SS; Bertrand OF; Krucoff MW; Windecker S; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 9(14):1419-34. PubMed ID: 27372195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The religious fervor for the radial approach.
King SB
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Mar; 8(3):501-502. PubMed ID: 25790766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Contemporary Arterial Access in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.
Sandoval Y; Burke MN; Lobo AS; Lips DL; Seto AH; Chavez I; Sorajja P; Abu-Fadel MS; Wang Y; Poulouse A; Gössl M; Mooney M; Traverse J; Tierney D; Brilakis ES
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2233-2241. PubMed ID: 29169493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transulnar cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: techniques, transradial comparisons, anatomical considerations, and comprehensive literature review.
Kar S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1126-1134. PubMed ID: 28766859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Targeting transradial approach.
Giustino G; Cota L; Chieffo A
Panminerva Med; 2015 Mar; 57(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 25373398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coronary intervention: radial artery access comes of age.
Jolly SS; Mehta SR
Lancet; 2015 Jun; 385(9986):2437-9. PubMed ID: 25791213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fernandez R; Zaky F; Ekmejian A; Curtis E; Lee A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 91(7):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 29388387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brener MI; Bush A; Miller JM; Hasan RK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 90(7):1093-1104. PubMed ID: 28544320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective analysis of coronary interventions in a single centre and comparison of specific differences between radial and femoral access.
Rychlik J; Hornacek I; Tejc M; Petrikovits E; Klimsa Z
Acta Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 74(4):325-330. PubMed ID: 30193077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale of the AKI-MATRIX (acute kidney injury-minimizing adverse hemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX) sub-study.
Andò G; Cortese B; Frigoli E; Gagnor A; Garducci S; Briguori C; Rubartelli P; Calabrò P; Valgimigli M;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 25854692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radial vs femoral access for the prevention of acute kidney injury (AKI) after coronary angiography or intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Andò G; Gragnano F; Calabrò P; Valgimigli M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):E518-E526. PubMed ID: 30244540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radial access protects from contrast media induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization procedures.
Feldkamp T; Luedemann M; Spehlmann ME; Freitag-Wolf S; Gaensbacher J; Schulte K; Bajrovic A; Hinzmann D; Hippe HJ; Kunzendorf U; Frey N; Luedde M
Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 107(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 28939956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radial versus femoral access for primary percutaneous interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Karrowni W; Vyas A; Giacomino B; Schweizer M; Blevins A; Girotra S; Horwitz PA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):814-23. PubMed ID: 23968700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of Sex on Comparative Outcomes of Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Data From the Randomized MATRIX-Access Trial.
Gargiulo G; Ariotti S; Vranckx P; Leonardi S; Frigoli E; Ciociano N; Tumscitz C; Tomassini F; Calabrò P; Garducci S; Crimi G; Andò G; Ferrario M; Limbruno U; Cortese B; Sganzerla P; Lupi A; Russo F; Garbo R; Ausiello A; Zavalloni D; Sardella G; Esposito G; Santarelli A; Tresoldi S; Nazzaro MS; Zingarelli A; Petronio AS; Windecker S; da Costa BR; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 29301646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
