BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26384584)

  • 21. Urethral pressure controlled balloon refilling or balloon change for artificial sphincter secondary procedure?
    Maximilien B; Aublea A; Gillibert A; Delcourt C; Grise P; Cornu JN
    Prog Urol; 2018 Mar; 28(4):209-214. PubMed ID: 29217348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pressure Regulating Balloon Herniation: A Correctable Cause of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Malfunction.
    Khouri RK; Baumgarten AS; Ortiz NM; Ward EE; Baker RC; VanDyke ME; Yi YA; Hudak SJ; Morey AF
    Urology; 2020 May; 139():188-192. PubMed ID: 32057792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A SUCCESSFUL CASE OF PARTIAL REPLACEMENT FOR MECHANICAL FAILURE OF ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER].
    Tanabe K; Yajima S; Matsumoto S; Okubo N; Nakanishi Y; Masuda H
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2022; 113(1):46-49. PubMed ID: 36682813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence.
    DiMarco DS; Elliott DS
    J Urol; 2003 Oct; 170(4 Pt 1):1252-4. PubMed ID: 14501735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictors of Device-related Complications After Exchange of the Pressure-regulating Balloon in Men With an Artificial Urinary Sphincter.
    Loh-Doyle JC; Nazemi A; Ashrafi A; Doumanian LR; Ginsberg DA; Boyd SD
    Urology; 2020 Jan; 135():154-158. PubMed ID: 31585200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Urethral atrophy is now a rare cause for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery in the contemporary 3.5 cm cuff era.
    Bergeson RL; Yi YA; Baker RC; Ward EE; Davenport MT; Morey AF
    Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Feb; 9(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 32055466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Early Revision after Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Does Not Impair the Long-Term Treatment Success.
    Sayedahmed K; Rosenhammer B; Burger M; Goßler C
    Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34289484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision in Nonneurological Male Patients.
    Bentellis I; El-Akri M; Cornu JN; Brierre T; Cousin T; Gaillard V; Dupuis H; Tricard T; Hermieu N; Bertrand-Leon P; Chevallier D; Bruyere F; Biardeau X; Hermieu JF; Lecoanet P; Capon G; Game X; Saussine C; Durand M; Peyronnet B
    J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1248-1257. PubMed ID: 34184925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Which revision strategy is the best for non-mechanical failure of male artificial urinary sphincter?
    Cousin T; Peyronnet B; Bentellis I; Lasri S; Taha F; Hermieu N; Boileau A; Zelmar A; Ciolek C; Dubois A; Leon P; Hermieu JF; Brierre T; Gamé X; Tricard T; Saussine C; Lecoanet P; Vidart A; Bruyère F; Cornu JN; Monsaint H; Biardeau X; Capon G
    World J Urol; 2023 Dec; 41(12):3663-3669. PubMed ID: 37902863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Dysfunctions of artificial urinary sphincters (AMS 800) and their management via a transscrotal access. Optimum procedure illustrated by reference to clinical examples].
    van der Horst C; Naumann CM; Wilson SK; Wefer B; Braun PM; Jünemann KP
    Urologe A; 2007 Dec; 46(12):1704-9. PubMed ID: 17932644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic challenges in the evaluation of persistent or recurrent urinary incontinence after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in patients after prostatectomy.
    Chung E; Cartmill R
    BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112 Suppl 2():32-5. PubMed ID: 24127674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Indications for revision of artificial urinary sphincter and modifiable risk factors for device-related morbidity.
    Anusionwu II; Wright EJ
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Jan; 32(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 22693077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of perioperative anticoagulation on artificial urinary sphincter device survival.
    Blackburne AT; Linder BJ; Elliott DS
    Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):339-341. PubMed ID: 28580867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do larger cuff sizes with artificial urinary sphincter placement increase the risk of leakage after placement?
    Otis-Chapados S; de Los Reyes T; Mousa A; Fervaha G; Radomski SB
    Can J Urol; 2023 Feb; 30(1):11419-11423. PubMed ID: 36779948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Small intestinal submucosa urethral wrap at the time of artificial urinary sphincter placement as a salvage treatment option for patients with persistent/recurrent incontinence following multiple prior sphincter failures and erosions.
    Trost L; Elliott D
    Urology; 2012 Apr; 79(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 22119252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical Risk Factors Associated With Urethral Atrophy.
    Viers BR; Mathur S; Hofer MD; Dugi DD; Pagliara TJ; Singla N; Walker J; Scott JM; Morey AF
    Urology; 2017 May; 103():230-233. PubMed ID: 27993713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Treatment of male urinary incontinence by artificial urinary sphincter with intracavernous cuff].
    Blah M; Caremel R; Sibert L; Bugel H; Grise P
    Prog Urol; 2008 Feb; 18(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 18396239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter failure.
    Kretschmer A; Buchner A; Grabbert M; Stief CG; Pavlicek M; Bauer RM
    World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):595-602. PubMed ID: 26253655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is Removal of the Pressure-regulating Balloon Necessary After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Erosion?
    Rozanski AT; Viers BR; Shakir NA; Pagliara TJ; Scott JM; Morey AF
    Urology; 2018 Mar; 113():225-229. PubMed ID: 29155193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter implantation as a salvage surgical procedure for challenging cases of male stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and functional outcomes in a contemporary series.
    Wiedemann L; Cornu JN; Haab E; Peyrat L; Beley S; Cathelineau X; Haab F
    BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1163-8. PubMed ID: 24053170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.