263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26384607)
1. Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography.
Nakata N; Ohta T; Nishioka M; Takeyama H; Toriumi Y; Kato K; Nogi H; Kamio M; Fukuda K
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1969-76. PubMed ID: 26384607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography by combined qualitative and quantitative analysis in breast lesions: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging.
Wang L; Du J; Li FH; Fang H; Hua J; Wan CF
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1805-14. PubMed ID: 24065262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can different regions of interest influence the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced sonography?
Li J; Guo L; Yin L; Fang H; Ye W; Zhao B; Liu Y; Xu T
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():1-6. PubMed ID: 30396640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined Use of Ultrasound Elastography and B-Mode Sonography for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Circumscribed Breast Masses.
Kim SY; Park JS; Koo HR
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1951-9. PubMed ID: 26384609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast tumors using kinetic features of real-time harmonic contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Saracco A; Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Wilczek B; Celebioglu F; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2012 May; 53(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 22434928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of (99m)Tc-3PRGD2 scintimammography for differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions: Comparison of visual and semi-quantitative analysis.
Chen Q; Xie Q; Zhao M; Chen B; Gao S; Zhang H; Xing H; Ma Q
Hell J Nucl Med; 2015; 18(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 26574690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification of breast tumors using sonographic texture analysis.
Ardakani AA; Gharbali A; Mohammadi A
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Feb; 34(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 25614395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.
Zhao H; Xu R; Ouyang Q; Chen L; Dong B; Huihua Y
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):288-93. PubMed ID: 19559551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign orbital masses.
Yuan Y; Kuai XP; Chen XS; Tao XF
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1506-11. PubMed ID: 23561057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Distinguishing benign and malignant lesions with time-signal intensity curve of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI scanning].
Yuan HM; Yu JQ; Chu ZG; Peng LQ
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Jul; 42(4):556-9. PubMed ID: 21866648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement in breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid
Haga M; Hirai T; Nakai T; Kobayashi T; Nakamura T; Marugami A; Ito T; Takewa M; Marugami N; Kichikawa K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Oct; 47(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 32989596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of sonazoid (perflubutane) for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differentiation of focal breast lesions: phase 3 multicenter clinical trial.
Miyamoto Y; Ito T; Takada E; Omoto K; Hirai T; Moriyasu F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):W400-7. PubMed ID: 24660739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of breast lesions by contrast enhanced ultrasound: qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Wan C; Du J; Fang H; Li F; Wang L
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e444-50. PubMed ID: 21612882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-time contrast-enhanced sonographically guided biopsy or radiofrequency ablation of focal liver lesions using perflurobutane microbubbles (sonazoid): value of Kupffer-phase imaging.
Park HS; Kim YJ; Yu MH; Jung SI; Jeon HJ
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Mar; 34(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 25715362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differentiation of Breast Lesions: A Meta-analysis.
Ma X; Liu R; Zhu C; Zhang J; Ling W
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2095-102. PubMed ID: 27503752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does adding diffuse optical tomography to sonography improve differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions? Observer performance study.
La Yun B; Kim SM; Jang M; Ahn HS; Lyou CY; Kim MS; Kim SA; Song TK; Yoo Y; Chang JH; Kim Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 May; 34(5):749-57. PubMed ID: 25911706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1-cm breast lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography.
Liu H; Jiang Y; Dai Q; Zhu Q; Wang L; Zhang J; Yang Q
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25542947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
