These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26384762)
1. Lab Retriever: a software tool for calculating likelihood ratios incorporating a probability of drop-out for forensic DNA profiles. Inman K; Rudin N; Cheng K; Robinson C; Kirschner A; Inman-Semerau L; Lohmueller KE BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():298. PubMed ID: 26384762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts. Bleka Ø; Storvik G; Gill P Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():35-44. PubMed ID: 26720812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures. Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model. Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ForeStatistics: A windows-based feature-rich software program for performing statistics in forensic DNA analysis, paternity and relationship testing. Rasool N; Hussain W Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110142. PubMed ID: 31927396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Likelihood Ratio Calculation Using LRmix Studio. Foley MM Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():307-328. PubMed ID: 37439990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Encoding of low-quality DNA profiles as genotype probability matrices for improved profile comparisons, relatedness evaluation and database searches. Ryan K; Williams DG; Balding DJ Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():227-239. PubMed ID: 27768939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in. Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines. Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the performance of different models for the interpretation of low level mixed DNA profiles. Bille TW; Weitz SM; Coble MD; Buckleton J; Bright JA Electrophoresis; 2014 Nov; 35(21-22):3125-33. PubMed ID: 25168355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):516-28. PubMed ID: 23948322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model. Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters. Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler(®) and PowerPlex(®) 16 forensic STR typing systems. Lohmueller KE; Rudin N; Inman K Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():1-11. PubMed ID: 24841801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of SmartRank: A likelihood ratio software for searching national DNA databases with complex DNA profiles. Benschop CCG; van de Merwe L; de Jong J; Vanvooren V; Kempenaers M; Kees van der Beek CP; Barni F; Reyes EL; Moulin L; Pene L; Haned H; Sijen T Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():145-153. PubMed ID: 28441635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DNAxs/DNAStatistX: Development and validation of a software suite for the data management and probabilistic interpretation of DNA profiles. Benschop CCG; Hoogenboom J; Hovers P; Slagter M; Kruise D; Parag R; Steensma K; Slooten K; Nagel JHA; Dieltjes P; van Marion V; van Paassen H; de Jong J; Creeten C; Sijen T; Kneppers ALJ Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():81-89. PubMed ID: 31254947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A series of recommended tests when validating probabilistic DNA profile interpretation software. Bright JA; Evett IW; Taylor D; Curran JM; Buckleton J Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():125-31. PubMed ID: 25450783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of multiple allelic drop-outs in forensic RMNE calculations. Christophe VN; Dieter D; Filip VN Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():243-249. PubMed ID: 26280568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The redesigned Forensic Research/Reference on Genetics-knowledge base, FROG-kb. Kidd KK; Soundararajan U; Rajeevan H; Pakstis AJ; Moore KN; Ropero-Miller JD Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():33-37. PubMed ID: 29175726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]