These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2638492)

  • 1. Mechanical resistance of extensive amalgam "restorations" anchored with the aid of threaded pins and amalgapins.
    Zangirolami NT; Steagall L; dos Santos Júnior J
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(1):289-93. PubMed ID: 2638492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of complex amalgam restorations using self-threading pins, amalgapins, and Amalgambond.
    Imbery TA; Hilton TJ; Reagan SE
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8599585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture resistance of extensive amalgam restorations retained by pins, amalgapins and amalgam bonding agents.
    Imbery TA; Coudron J; Moon PC
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 19051860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-threading pins and amalgapins compared in resistance form for complex amalgam restorations.
    Davis SP; Summitt JB; Mayhew RB; Hawley RJ
    Oper Dent; 1983; 8(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 6583666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of distribution of resistance features in complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Rindler EA; Robbins JW; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8008611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations.
    Imbery TA; Burgess JO; Batzer RC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 126(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 7797731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Robbins JW; Burgess JO; Summitt JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr; 118(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 2651502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of cross-sectional area on transverse strength of Amalgapin-retained restorations.
    Certosimo AJ; House RC; Anderson MH
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 1803331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Kaiser DA; Rux HW; Dutton FB
    Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 1814348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Optimized pin geometry for improved retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam].
    Neumeyer S; Gernet W; Bötsch H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Aug; 46(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 1817928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention of threaded pins in amalgam.
    Podshadley AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 2404107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Slots vs pins: a comparison of retention under simulated chewing stresses.
    Outhwaite WC; Twiggs SW; Fairhurst CW; King GE
    J Dent Res; 1982 Feb; 61(2):400-2. PubMed ID: 6948858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro resistance of extensive amalgam restorations using various retention methods.
    Plasmans PJ; Kusters ST; de Jonge BA; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jan; 57(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 3468247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars.
    Uyehara MY; Davis RD; Overton JD
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):364-70. PubMed ID: 10823086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A photoelastic study of stress concentrations produced by retention pins in amalgam restorations.
    Dhuru VB; McLachlan K; Kasloff Z
    J Dent Res; 1979 Mar; 58(3):1060-4. PubMed ID: 370168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pin vs. slot retention in extensive amalgam restorations.
    Outhwaite WC; Garman TA; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Apr; 41(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 284120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.