These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26384985)

  • 1. Reverse engineering the world: a commentary on Hoffman, Singh, and Prakash, "The interface theory of perception".
    Fields C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1526-9. PubMed ID: 26384985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interface theory of perception leaves me hungry for more: Commentary on Hoffman, Singh, and Prakash, "The interface theory of perception".
    Schlesinger M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1548-50. PubMed ID: 26384992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian inference and "truth": a comment on Hoffman, Singh, and Prakash.
    Feldman J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1523-5. PubMed ID: 26384987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Notions such as "truth" or "correspondence to the objective world" play no role in explanatory accounts of perception.
    Mausfeld R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1535-40. PubMed ID: 26384991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are icons sense data?
    McLaughlin BP; Green EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1541-5. PubMed ID: 26384993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual representation, veridicality, and the interface theory of perception.
    Cohen J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1512-8. PubMed ID: 26452374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Varieties of perceptual truth and their possible evolutionary roots.
    Edelman S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1519-22. PubMed ID: 25304473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Philosophizing cannot substitute for experimentation: comment on Hoffman, Singh & Prakash (2014).
    Pizlo Z
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1546-7. PubMed ID: 26384989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The interface theory of perception: the future of the science of the mind?
    Hickok G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1477-9. PubMed ID: 26391034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esse est percipi & verum factum est.
    Koenderink J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1530-4. PubMed ID: 26384990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Interface Theory of Perception.
    Hoffman DD; Singh M; Prakash C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1480-506. PubMed ID: 26384988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fitness Beats Truth in the Evolution of Perception.
    Prakash C; Stephens KD; Hoffman DD; Singh M; Fields C
    Acta Biotheor; 2021 Sep; 69(3):319-341. PubMed ID: 33231784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where does fitness fit in theories of perception?
    Anderson BL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1507-11. PubMed ID: 26384986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Probing the interface theory of perception: Reply to commentaries.
    Hoffman DD; Singh M; Prakash C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1551-76. PubMed ID: 26424222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexicons, contexts, events, and images: commentary on Elman (2009) from the perspective of dual coding theory.
    Paivio A; Sadoski M
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(1):198-209. PubMed ID: 21428998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rate-distortion theory and human perception.
    Sims CR
    Cognition; 2016 Jul; 152():181-198. PubMed ID: 27107330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Man and the indeterminacies.
    Platt JR
    Perspect Biol Med; 1966; 10(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 6002669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational evolutionary perception.
    Hoffman DD; Singh M
    Perception; 2012; 41(9):1073-91. PubMed ID: 23409373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting.
    De Jaegher H
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):535-42; discussion 543-50. PubMed ID: 19091603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Continuing debates on direct social perception: Some notes on Gallagher's analysis of "the new hybrids".
    Bohl V
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Nov; 36():466-71. PubMed ID: 26033664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.