These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26385713)

  • 1. Evaluation of samples comprising minute amounts of DNA.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; Yoo SY; Sijen T
    Sci Justice; 2015 Sep; 55(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 26385713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results.
    Benschop CC; van der Beek CP; Meiland HC; van Gorp AG; Westen AA; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):316-28. PubMed ID: 20655289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Probabilistic approaches to interpreting two-person DNA mixtures from post-coital specimens.
    Rodriguez JJRB; Bright JA; Salvador JM; Laude RP; De Ungria MCA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Jul; 300():157-163. PubMed ID: 31112838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Likelihood Ratio Calculation Using LRmix Studio.
    Foley MM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():307-328. PubMed ID: 37439990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; de Blaeij TJ; Meulenbroek AJ; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 22613779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different interpretation strategies for low template DNA mixtures.
    Pfeifer CM; Klein-Unseld R; Klintschar M; Wiegand P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 22739132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.
    Manabe S; Morimoto C; Hamano Y; Fujimoto S; Tamaki K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188183. PubMed ID: 29149210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced low-template DNA analysis conditions and investigation of allele dropout patterns.
    Hedell R; Dufva C; Ansell R; Mostad P; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jan; 14():61-75. PubMed ID: 25282604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verifying likelihoods for low template DNA profiles using multiple replicates.
    Steele CD; Greenhalgh M; Balding DJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():82-9. PubMed ID: 25082140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A mixed DNA profile controversy revisited.
    Kalafut T; Pugh S; Gill P; Abbas S; Semaan M; Mansour I; Curran J; Bright JA; Hicks T; Wivell R; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 34651300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
    Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data?
    Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():13-16. PubMed ID: 25474687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
    Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
    Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.