These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1032 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26386459)

  • 1. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
    Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-year postoperative outcomes between MIS and conventional TLIF in1-segment lumbar disc herniation.
    Lv Y; Chen J; Chen J; Wu Y; Chen X; Liu Y; Chu Z; Sheng L; Qin R; Chen M
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Jun; 26(3):168-176. PubMed ID: 28084155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Kim JY; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1284-93. PubMed ID: 26072461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two minimally invasive surgery strategies to treat adult spinal deformity.
    Park P; Wang MY; Lafage V; Nguyen S; Ziewacz J; Okonkwo DO; Uribe JS; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Haque R; Fessler RG; Kanter AS; Deviren V; La Marca F; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Mundis GM; Mummaneni PV;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 25635632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complete anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis of Grade II and higher: use of the minimally invasive "rocking" technique.
    Rajakumar DV; Hari A; Krishna M; Sharma A; Reddy M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E12. PubMed ID: 28760034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive versus mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in managing low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Ali EMS; Abdeen M; Saleh MK
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2024 Sep; 166(1):365. PubMed ID: 39264454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinct fusion intersegmental parameters regarding local sagittal balance provide similar clinical outcomes: a comparative study of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Li F; Li C; Xi X; Zeng Z; Ma B; Xie N; Wang H; Yu Y; Cheng L
    BMC Surg; 2020 May; 20(1):97. PubMed ID: 32398125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Expandable Lordotic Devices.
    McMordie JH; Schmidt KP; Gard AP; Gillis CC
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Feb; 86(2):E147-E155. PubMed ID: 31584070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical and radiologic comparison between oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Chen X; Wu LL; Yang ZC; Qiu YJ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2023 May; 36(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 37211931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
    Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Outcomes Between Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Retrospective Study.
    Xu H; Yu L; Xiao B; Zhao H; Gu X; Gao Z; Wang W
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():e98-e108. PubMed ID: 38008170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Shen X; Wang L; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; He S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Feb; 29(1):E1-8. PubMed ID: 24189485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.
    Armocida D; Pesce A; Cimatti M; Proietti L; Santoro A; Frati A
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e57-e63. PubMed ID: 34492389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 52.