These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26386787)

  • 21. Comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in patients undergoing multilesion and multivessel intervention: the SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) randomized trials.
    Kereiakes DJ; Sudhir K; Hermiller JB; Gordon PC; Ferguson J; Yaqub M; Sood P; Su X; Yakubov S; Lansky AJ; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Dec; 3(12):1229-39. PubMed ID: 21232716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Dangas GD; Serruys PW; Kereiakes DJ; Hermiller J; Rizvi A; Newman W; Sudhir K; Smith RS; Cao S; Theodoropoulos K; Cutlip DE; Lansky AJ; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 6(9):914-22. PubMed ID: 24050859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Blinded outcomes and angina assessment of coronary bioresorbable scaffolds: 30-day and 1-year results from the ABSORB IV randomised trial.
    Stone GW; Ellis SG; Gori T; Metzger DC; Stein B; Erickson M; Torzewski J; Williams J; Lawson W; Broderick TM; Kabour A; Piegari G; Cavendish J; Bertolet B; Choi JW; Marx SO; Généreux P; Kereiakes DJ;
    Lancet; 2018 Oct; 392(10157):1530-1540. PubMed ID: 30266412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of early clinical outcomes between ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold and everolimus-eluting stent implantation in a real-world population.
    Costopoulos C; Latib A; Naganuma T; Miyazaki T; Sato K; Figini F; Sticchi A; Carlino M; Chieffo A; Montorfano M; Colombo A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 85(1):E10-5. PubMed ID: 24909303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 1-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis.
    Stone GW; Gao R; Kimura T; Kereiakes DJ; Ellis SG; Onuma Y; Cheong WF; Jones-McMeans J; Su X; Zhang Z; Serruys PW
    Lancet; 2016 Mar; 387(10025):1277-89. PubMed ID: 26825231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical and intravascular imaging outcomes at 1 and 2 years after implantation of absorb everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in small vessels. Late lumen enlargement: does bioresorption matter with small vessel size? Insight from the ABSORB cohort B trial.
    Diletti R; Farooq V; Girasis C; Bourantas C; Onuma Y; Heo JH; Gogas BD; van Geuns RJ; Regar E; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Chevalier B; McClean D; Windecker S; Whitbourn RJ; Smits P; Koolen J; Meredith I; Li X; Miquel-Hebert K; Veldhof S; Garcia-Garcia HM; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
    Heart; 2013 Jan; 99(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 23118346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical Comparison With Short-Term Follow-Up of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Cortese B; Ielasi A; Romagnoli E; Varricchio A; Cuculo A; Loi B; Pisano F; Corrado D; Sesana M; La Vecchia L; Summaria F; Tespili M; Silva Orrego P; Tognoni G; Steffenino G
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 116(5):705-10. PubMed ID: 26100584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan.
    Kimura T; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Nakamura S; Yamane M; Muramatsu T; Saito S; Yajima J; Hagiwara N; Mitsudo K; Popma JJ; Serruys PW; Onuma Y; Ying S; Cao S; Staehr P; Cheong WF; Kusano H; Stone GW;
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3332-42. PubMed ID: 26330419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Two-year clinical outcomes of the EVERBIO II trial.
    Arroyo D; Gendre G; Schukraft S; Kallinikou Z; Müller O; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Togni M; Cook S; Puricel S
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 243():121-125. PubMed ID: 28576627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical follow-up 3 years after everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a pooled analysis from the SPIRIT II (A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) randomized trials.
    Caixeta A; Lansky AJ; Serruys PW; Hermiller JB; Ruygrok P; Onuma Y; Gordon P; Yaqub M; Miquel-Hebert K; Veldhof S; Sood P; Su X; Jonnavithula L; Sudhir K; Stone GW;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Dec; 3(12):1220-8. PubMed ID: 21232715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Three-Year Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold: Individual-Patient-Data Meta-Analysis From the ABSORB Randomized Trials.
    Ali ZA; Gao R; Kimura T; Onuma Y; Kereiakes DJ; Ellis SG; Chevalier B; Vu MT; Zhang Z; Simonton CA; Serruys PW; Stone GW
    Circulation; 2018 Jan; 137(5):464-479. PubMed ID: 29089314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Randomised comparison of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold with a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: the 2-year clinical outcomes of the ABSORB II trial.
    Chevalier B; Onuma Y; van Boven AJ; Piek JJ; Sabaté M; Helqvist S; Baumbach A; Smits PC; Kumar R; Wasungu L; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(9):1102-1107. PubMed ID: 27564310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial.
    Stone GW; Midei M; Newman W; Sanz M; Hermiller JB; Williams J; Farhat N; Caputo R; Xenopoulos N; Applegate R; Gordon P; White RM; Sudhir K; Cutlip DE; Petersen JL;
    Circulation; 2009 Feb; 119(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 19171853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Incidence and Potential Mechanism(s) of Post-Procedural Rise of Cardiac Biomarker in Patients With Coronary Artery Narrowing After Implantation of an Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold or Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent.
    Ishibashi Y; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Suwannasom P; Grundeken MJ; Cho YK; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Boven AJ; Piek JJ; Sabaté M; Helqvist S; Baumbach A; McClean D; de Sousa Almeida M; Wasungu L; Miquel-Hebert K; Dudek D; Chevalier B; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jul; 8(8):1053-1063. PubMed ID: 26205444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Risk and timing of clinical events according to diabetic status of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stent: 2-year results from a propensity score matched comparison of ABSORB EXTEND and SPIRIT trials.
    Campos CM; Caixeta A; Franken M; Bartorelli AL; Whitbourn RJ; Wu CJ; Li Paul Kao H; Rosli MA; Carrie D; De Bruyne B; Stone GW; Serruys PW; Abizaid A;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):387-395. PubMed ID: 28471086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mid-term clinical outcomes of ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting stent for coronary bifurcation lesions.
    Naganuma T; Kawamoto H; Panoulas VF; Latib A; Tanaka A; Mitomo S; Ruparelia N; Jabbour RJ; Chieffo A; Carlino M; Montorfano M; Colombo A
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 246():26-31. PubMed ID: 28867010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Head-to-head comparison of the neointimal response between metallic and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds using optical coherence tomography.
    Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Diletti R; Windecker S; Thuesen L; McClean D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Dudek D; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Regar E; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 22192368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of in vivo acute stent recoil between the bioresorbable everolimus-eluting coronary scaffolds (revision 1.0 and 1.1) and the metallic everolimus-eluting stent.
    Onuma Y; Serruys PW; Gomez J; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Smits P; Chevalier B; McClean D; Koolen J; Windecker S; Whitbourn R; Meredith I; Garcia-Garcia H; Ormiston JA;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 78(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 21413120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal Trends in Adverse Events After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Montone RA; Niccoli G; De Marco F; Minelli S; D'Ascenzo F; Testa L; Bedogni F; Crea F
    Circulation; 2017 May; 135(22):2145-2154. PubMed ID: 28559495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents: final five-year results of the AIDA randomised clinical trial.
    Kerkmeijer LSM; Renkens MPL; Tijssen RYG; Hofma SH; van der Schaaf RJ; Arkenbout EK; Weevers APJD; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kraak R; Piek JJ; Tijssen JGP; Henriques JPS; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ
    EuroIntervention; 2022 Mar; 17(16):1340-1347. PubMed ID: 34483094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.