These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26386947)
1. Radiologic Assessment of Periapical Health: Comparison of 3 Different Index Systems. Tarcin B; Gumru B; Iriboz E; Turkaydin DE; Ovecoglu HS J Endod; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1834-8. PubMed ID: 26386947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of New Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Criteria for Radiographic Healing Evaluation after Apical Surgery: Assessment of Repeatability and Reproducibility. von Arx T; Janner SF; Hänni S; Bornstein MM J Endod; 2016 Feb; 42(2):236-42. PubMed ID: 26723486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of computerised image analysis to monitoring endodontic therapy: reproducibility and comparison with visual assessment. Kerosuo E; Orstavik D Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Mar; 26(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 9442621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endodontic radiography: who is reading the digital radiograph? Tewary S; Luzzo J; Hartwell G J Endod; 2011 Jul; 37(7):919-21. PubMed ID: 21689544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film. Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of detailed zonography with periapical radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Rosberg J; Vähätalo K; Tammisalo EH Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 May; 24(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 9515382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiological assessment of periapical status using the periapical index: comparison of periapical radiography and digital panoramic radiography. Ridao-Sacie C; Segura-Egea JJ; Fernández-Palacín A; Bullón-Fernández P; Ríos-Santos JV Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 17451455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Periapical radiolucencies as evaluated by bisecting-angle and paralleling radiographic techniques. Forsberg J; Halse A Int Endod J; 1997 Mar; 30(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 10332245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endodontic retreatment. Aspects of decision making and clinical outcome. Kvist T Swed Dent J Suppl; 2001; (144):1-57. PubMed ID: 11288682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology. Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG; Hollender L Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8508938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Periapical and endodontic status scale based on periapical bone lesions and endodontic treatment quality evaluation using cone-beam computed tomography. Venskutonis T; Plotino G; Tocci L; Gambarini G; Maminskas J; Juodzbalys G J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25498834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography. Sogur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG; Lomcali G; Sen BH Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):458-64. PubMed ID: 19767516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observer performance in the assessment of periapical pathology: a comparison of panoramic with periapical radiography. Rohlin M; Kullendorff B; Ahlqwist M; Stenström B Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 1807995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study. Pham D; Jonasson G; Kiliaridis S Acta Odontol Scand; 2010 Mar; 68(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20085501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular cortical index evaluation in masked and unmasked panoramic radiographs. Yasar F; Sener S; Yesilova E; Akgünlü F Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 19176650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra- and Interobserver Agreement during the Assessment of the Different Stages of Root Development Using 4 Radiographic Classifications. Plascencia H; Díaz M; Ordinola-Zapata R; Vázquez-Sánchez ME; Juárez-Broon N; Ruíz-Gutiérrez A; Gascón G; Cruz A J Endod; 2021 Jun; 47(6):906-913. PubMed ID: 33705830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions. Koenig L; Parks E; Analoui M; Eckert G Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 15140821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term reliability and observer comparisons in the radiographic diagnosis of periapical disease. Molven O; Halse A; Fristad I Int Endod J; 2002 Feb; 35(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 11843968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of periapical and detailed narrow-beam radiography for diagnosis of periapical bone lesions. Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Vähätalo K; Tammisalo EH Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):183-7. PubMed ID: 8181644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic parameters of quality of root canal fillings and periapical status: a retrospective cohort study. Santos SM; Soares JA; Costa GM; Brito-Júnior M; Moreira AN; de Magalhães CS J Endod; 2010 Dec; 36(12):1932-7. PubMed ID: 21092808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]