84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2638718)
21. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computer simulation of quantal dose-response relationships.
McGilliard KL
Physiologist; 1985 Oct; 28(5):449-50. PubMed ID: 3906702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of beam model differences in the comparison of dose calculation algorithms for lung cancer treatment planning.
Chetty IJ; Rosu M; McShan DL; Fraass BA; Ten Haken RK
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):801-15. PubMed ID: 15798256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Use of the CD-ROM "Tox-Didact" for teaching of toxicology and pharmacology].
Ortega A; Pineau A; Boniffay J; Benois-Pineau J; Autret JP; Larousse C
Therapie; 2000; 55(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 10860025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interval estimation of the median lethal dose.
Williams DA
Biometrics; 1986 Sep; 42(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 3567296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Calculation of the index of acute toxicity by the method of linear regression. Comparison with the method of "Karber and Behrens"].
Gilles HJ
Eur J Toxicol Environ Hyg; 1974; 7(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 4408718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Modeling of salivary production recovery after radiotherapy using mixed models: determination of optimal dose constraint for IMRT planning and construction of convenient tools to predict salivary function.
Ortholan C; Chamorey E; Benezery K; Thariat J; Dassonville O; Poissonnet G; Bozec A; Follana P; Peyrade F; Sudaka A; Gerard JP; Bensadoun RJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jan; 73(1):178-86. PubMed ID: 18565687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The use of a computer for the diagnosis of comatose states in diabetics (a differential diagnostic algorithm)].
Sokol AE; Diakov VA; Khaimzon II
Ter Arkh; 1989; 61(12):70-2. PubMed ID: 2697957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of rodent-only toxicology for early clinical trials with novel cancer therapeutics.
Newell DR; Burtles SS; Fox BW; Jodrell DI; Connors TA
Br J Cancer; 1999 Nov; 81(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 10555743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ordered multiple comparisons with the best and their applications to dose-response studies.
Strassburger K; Bretz F; Finner H
Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1143-51. PubMed ID: 17489969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An implementation of the Expectation-Maximisation (EM) algorithm for population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in ACSLXTREME.
Yates JW
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Oct; 96(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 19410328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of the benchmark dose in a regulatory context.
Travis KZ; Pate I; Welsh ZK
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Dec; 43(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 16143439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A free software for the evaluation and comparison of dose response models in clinical radiotherapy (DORES).
Tsougos I; Grout I; Theodorou K; Kappas C
Int J Radiat Biol; 2009 Mar; 85(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 19296336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The benchmark dose method--review of available models, and recommendations for application in health risk assessment.
Filipsson AF; Sand S; Nilsson J; Victorin K
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2003; 33(5):505-42. PubMed ID: 14594105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The rating reliability calculator.
Solomon DJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Apr; 4():11. PubMed ID: 15117416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A generalized multihit dose-response model for low-dose extrapolation.
Rai K; Van Ryzin J
Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):341-52. PubMed ID: 7272419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The median lethal dose and its estimation.
Finney DJ
Arch Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 56(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 3994505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [A preliminary study of beam weight optimization of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with genetic algorithm].
Tang MT; Chen CM; Zhou LH; Lü QW; Wang ZY; Chen GJ
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2006 Apr; 26(4):456-8. PubMed ID: 16624751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Calculation of the standard error of the effective dose ratio].
Prozorovskiĭ VB; Frumin GT
Farmakol Toksikol; 1991; 54(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 1860508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Which value should be used as the lethal concentration 50 (LC(50)) with bacteria?
Rath S; Sahu MC; Dubey D; Debata NK; Padhy RN
Interdiscip Sci; 2011 Jun; 3(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 21541843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
