These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26387634)

  • 1. A novel fMRI group data analysis method based on data-driven reference extracting from group subjects.
    Shi Y; Zeng W; Wang N; Chen D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Dec; 122(3):362-71. PubMed ID: 26387634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An improved multi-objective optimization-based CICA method with data-driver temporal reference for group fMRI data analysis.
    Shi Y; Zeng W; Tang X; Kong W; Yin J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Apr; 56(4):683-694. PubMed ID: 28864838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SCGICAR: Spatial concatenation based group ICA with reference for fMRI data analysis.
    Shi Y; Zeng W; Wang N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Sep; 148():137-151. PubMed ID: 28774436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subject order-independent group ICA (SOI-GICA) for functional MRI data analysis.
    Zhang H; Zuo XN; Ma SY; Zang YF; Milham MP; Zhu CZ
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jul; 51(4):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20338245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Group information guided ICA for fMRI data analysis.
    Du Y; Fan Y
    Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 69():157-97. PubMed ID: 23194820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Separating 4D multi-task fMRI data of multiple subjects by independent component analysis with projection.
    Long Z; Li R; Wen X; Jin Z; Chen K; Yao L
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jan; 31(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 22898701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Model-free fMRI group analysis using FENICA.
    Schöpf V; Windischberger C; Robinson S; Kasess CH; Fischmeister FP; Lanzenberger R; Albrecht J; Kleemann AM; Kopietz R; Wiesmann M; Moser E
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):185-93. PubMed ID: 21078400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SACICA: a sparse approximation coefficient-based ICA model for functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis.
    Wang N; Zeng W; Chen L
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 May; 216(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 23563324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards data-driven group inferences of resting-state fMRI data in rodents: Comparison of group ICA, GIG-ICA, and IVA-GL.
    To XV; Vegh V; Nasrallah FA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2022 Jan; 366():109411. PubMed ID: 34793852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliable intrinsic connectivity networks: test-retest evaluation using ICA and dual regression approach.
    Zuo XN; Kelly C; Adelstein JS; Klein DF; Castellanos FX; Milham MP
    Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(3):2163-77. PubMed ID: 19896537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved FastICA algorithm in fMRI data analysis using the sparsity property of the sources.
    Ge R; Wang Y; Zhang J; Yao L; Zhang H; Long Z
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Apr; 263():103-14. PubMed ID: 26880161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Iterative approach of dual regression with a sparse prior enhances the performance of independent component analysis for group functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data.
    Kim YH; Kim J; Lee JH
    Neuroimage; 2012 Dec; 63(4):1864-89. PubMed ID: 22939873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: a simulation study.
    Allen EA; Erhardt EB; Wei Y; Eichele T; Calhoun VD
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(4):4141-59. PubMed ID: 22019879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling state-related fMRI activity using change-point theory.
    Lindquist MA; Waugh C; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2007 Apr; 35(3):1125-41. PubMed ID: 17360198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preserving subject variability in group fMRI analysis: performance evaluation of GICA vs. IVA.
    Michael AM; Anderson M; Miller RL; Adalı T; Calhoun VD
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2014; 8():106. PubMed ID: 25018704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Capturing subject variability in fMRI data: A graph-theoretical analysis of GICA vs. IVA.
    Laney J; Westlake KP; Ma S; Woytowicz E; Calhoun VD; Adalı T
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 May; 247():32-40. PubMed ID: 25797843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of repeatability measures on results of fMRI sICA: a study on simulated and real resting-state effects.
    Remes JJ; Starck T; Nikkinen J; Ollila E; Beckmann CF; Tervonen O; Kiviniemi V; Silven O
    Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(2):554-69. PubMed ID: 20451623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of multi-subject ICA methods for analysis of fMRI data.
    Erhardt EB; Rachakonda S; Bedrick EJ; Allen EA; Adali T; Calhoun VD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2011 Dec; 32(12):2075-95. PubMed ID: 21162045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Tutorial Review on Multi-subject Decomposition of EEG.
    Huster RJ; Raud L
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Jan; 31(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 29063237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A group model for stable multi-subject ICA on fMRI datasets.
    Varoquaux G; Sadaghiani S; Pinel P; Kleinschmidt A; Poline JB; Thirion B
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):288-99. PubMed ID: 20153834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.