These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2638832)

  • 1. [The most frequently used implant materials in the oromaxillofacial area].
    Santamaria Zuazua J; Martinez Conde R; Goiriena de Gandarias FJ
    Rev Eur Odontoestomatol; 1989; 1(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 2638832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The choice of alloplastic materials for oral implants: does it really matter?
    Glantz PO
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 9922732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental implants.
    Holt R
    J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1986; 34(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 2943904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Titanium subperiosteal implants.
    Linkow LI
    J Oral Implantol; 1989; 15(1):29-33, 36-40. PubMed ID: 2634777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Ceramic implants to benefit complete lower dentures].
    Pigot JL; Dubruille JH; Dubruille MT; Mercier JP; Cohen P
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1997 Nov; 98 Suppl 1():10-3. PubMed ID: 9471680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histological response to titanium endodontic endosseous implants in dogs.
    Parreira FR; Bramwell JD; Roahen JO; Giambarresi L
    J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):161-4. PubMed ID: 8935011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design optimization of functionally graded dental implant.
    Hedia HS; Mahmoud NA
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15156104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regeneration of peri-implant infrabony defects using PerioGlas: a pilot study in rabbits.
    Johnson MW; Sullivan SM; Rohrer M; Collier M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):835-9. PubMed ID: 9425765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trabecular bone response to titanium implants with a thin carbonate-containing apatite coating applied using the molecular precursor method.
    Hayakawa T; Takahashi K; Yoshinari M; Okada H; Yamamoto H; Sato M; Nemoto K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 17190294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The zirconia implant-bone interface: a preliminary histologic evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Gallez F; Jung RE; Weber FE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 18807566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrastructural comparisons of ceramic and titanium dental implants in vivo: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Steflik DE; McKinney RV; Koth DL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Aug; 23(8):895-909. PubMed ID: 2674150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biologically driven prosthetic options in implant dentistry.
    Touati B
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 16(7):517-20. PubMed ID: 15485165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant materials in dentistry.
    de Groot K
    Med Prog Technol; 1982; 9(2-3):129-36. PubMed ID: 7162482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants.
    Kohal RJ; Papavasiliou G; Kamposiora P; Tripodakis A; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 11951811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The Cerasand endosseous implant].
    Sandhaus S
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1987 Dec; 41(160 Spec No):607-26. PubMed ID: 3332980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite) oral implants in type IV bone.
    Huang YH; Xiropaidis AV; Sorensen RG; Albandar JM; Hall J; Wikesjö UM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 15642037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.