These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26388796)
1. Individual differences in the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal predict the reward-related processing. Sai L; Wang S; Ward A; Ku Y; Sang B Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1256. PubMed ID: 26388796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How does cognitive reappraisal affect the response to gains and losses? Yang Q; Gu R; Tang P; Luo YJ Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1094-103. PubMed ID: 23889144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative left frontal activity in reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion: Evidence from frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA). Choi D; Sekiya T; Minote N; Watanuki S Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Nov; 109():37-44. PubMed ID: 27693504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-individual differences in the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression are associated with variations in prefrontal cognitive control for emotional information: an event related fMRI study. Vanderhasselt MA; Baeken C; Van Schuerbeek P; Luypaert R; De Raedt R Biol Psychol; 2013 Mar; 92(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 22445780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of expectations and habitual emotion regulation in emotional processing: An ERP investigation. Brudner EG; Denkova E; Paczynski M; Jha AP Emotion; 2018 Mar; 18(2):171-180. PubMed ID: 28447826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of anhedonia on feedback negativity in major depressive disorder. Liu WH; Wang LZ; Shang HR; Shen Y; Li Z; Cheung EF; Chan RC Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():213-20. PubMed ID: 24316199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Self-report and behavioral measures of reward sensitivity predict the feedback negativity. Bress JN; Hajcak G Psychophysiology; 2013 Jul; 50(7):610-6. PubMed ID: 23656631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between habitual use and real-time emotion regulation strategies in adolescents: Evidence from frontal EEG asymmetry. Yang M; Deng X; An S Neuropsychologia; 2021 Nov; 162():108056. PubMed ID: 34627837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Show me the Money: the impact of actual rewards and losses on the feedback negativity. Weinberg A; Riesel A; Proudfit GH Brain Cogn; 2014 Jun; 87():134-9. PubMed ID: 24735733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Event-Related Potentials Are Associated With Unexpected Gain and Loss: Using a Gambling Paradigm. Krause D; Jobst A; Langemak SM; Keeser D; Chrobok AI; Langgartner S; Adorjan K; Gertzen M; Pogarell O; Karch S Clin EEG Neurosci; 2019 May; 50(3):154-160. PubMed ID: 30477341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The interplay between the anticipation and subsequent online processing of emotional stimuli as measured by pupillary dilatation: the role of cognitive reappraisal. Vanderhasselt MA; Remue J; Ng KK; De Raedt R Front Psychol; 2014; 5():207. PubMed ID: 24659976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual Differences in Spontaneous Expressive Suppression Predict Amygdala Responses to Fearful Stimuli: The Role of Suppression Priming. Chen S; Deng Z; Xu Y; Long Q; Yang J; Yuan J Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1. PubMed ID: 28197108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of cognitive reappraisal and expression suppression on sadness and the recognition of sad scenes: An event-related potential study. Yan C; Ding Q; Wang Y; Wu M; Gao T; Liu X Front Psychol; 2022; 13():935007. PubMed ID: 36211892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies role in the emotion regulation: an overview on their modulatory effects and neural correlates. Cutuli D Front Syst Neurosci; 2014; 8():175. PubMed ID: 25285072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship Between Habitual Use and Degree of Emotion Regulation: Age Differences in Cognitive Reappraisal and Expressive Suppression. Oriyama K; Mukai K; Harada K; Masumoto K Exp Aging Res; 2024 Feb; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38372075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression relate differentially to longitudinal structural brain development across adolescence. Ferschmann L; Vijayakumar N; Grydeland H; Overbye K; Mills KL; Fjell AM; Walhovd KB; Pfeifer JH; Tamnes CK Cortex; 2021 Mar; 136():109-123. PubMed ID: 33545616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics of the regulation of the surprise emotion. Zhu C; Li P; Zhang Z; Liu D; Luo W Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7576. PubMed ID: 31110212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human oscillatory activity associated to reward processing in a gambling task. Marco-Pallares J; Cucurell D; Cunillera T; García R; Andrés-Pueyo A; Münte TF; Rodríguez-Fornells A Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 17804025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]