132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26389058)
1. A comparative study of metal artifacts from common metal orthodontic brackets in magnetic resonance imaging.
Dalili Kajan Z; Khademi J; Alizadeh A; Babaei Hemmaty Y; Atrkar Roushan Z
Imaging Sci Dent; 2015 Sep; 45(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 26389058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Galvanic Currents Generated Between Different Combinations of Orthodontic Brackets and Archwires Using Potentiostat: An In Vitro Study.
Nayak RS; Shafiuddin B; Pasha A; Vinay K; Narayan A; Shetty SV
J Int Oral Health; 2015 Jul; 7(7):29-35. PubMed ID: 26229367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Galvanic Corrosion of and Ion Release from Various Orthodontic Brackets and Wires in a Fluoride-containing Mouthwash.
Tahmasbi S; Ghorbani M; Masudrad M
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2015; 9(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 26697148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ion Release and Galvanic Corrosion of Different Orthodontic Brackets and Wires in Artificial Saliva.
Tahmasbi S; Sheikh T; Hemmati YB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Mar; 18(3):222-227. PubMed ID: 28258269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
Kapila S; Angolkar PV; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2378317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the hardness of different orthodontic wires and brackets produced by metal injection molding and conventional methods.
Alavi S; Kachuie M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2017; 14(4):282-287. PubMed ID: 28928783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical properties of different esthetic and conventional orthodontic wires in bending tests : An in vitro study.
Alobeid A; Dirk C; Reimann S; El-Bialy T; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):241-252. PubMed ID: 27942768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface topography of plain nickel-titanium (NiTi), as-received aesthetic (coated) NiTi, and aesthetic NiTi archwires sterilized by autoclaving or glutaraldehyde immersion: A profilometry/SEM/AFM study.
Shamohammadi M; Hormozi E; Moradinezhad M; Moradi M; Skini M; Rakhshan V
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 30777734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
Husain N; Kumar A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Evaluation of Friction Resistance of Titanium, Stainless Steel, Ceramic and Ceramic with Metal Insert Brackets with Varying Dimensions of Stainless Steel Wire: An In vitro Multi-center Study.
Kumar BS; Miryala S; Kumar KK; Shameem K; Regalla RR
J Int Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 6(5):66-71. PubMed ID: 25395796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the dimensions and surface characteristics of orthodontic wires and bracket slots.
Dolci GS; Spohr AM; Zimmer ER; Marchioro EM
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 23916434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Frictional Forces Generated by a New Ceramic Bracket with the Conventional Brackets using Unconventional and Conventional Ligation System and the Self-ligating Brackets: An In Vitro Study.
Pasha A; Vishwakarma S; Narayan A; Vinay K; Shetty SV; Roy PP
J Int Oral Health; 2015 Sep; 7(9):108-13. PubMed ID: 26435628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Frictional Resistance in Conventional Brackets with Different Stainless Steel Wires.
Sunda S; Miglani A; Kumar RR; Panghal V; Khanna P; Arora N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1135-1139. PubMed ID: 30287717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of galvanic corrosion potential of metal injection molded brackets to that of conventional metal brackets with nickel-titanium and copper nickel-titanium archwire combinations.
Varma DP; Chidambaram S; Reddy KB; Vijay M; Ravindranath D; Prasad MR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):488-95. PubMed ID: 24171995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.
Elison JM; Leggitt VL; Thomson M; Oyoyo U; Wycliffe ND
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 18929275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.
Vaughan JL; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7817958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
