These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26389133)

  • 21. Condylar determinants in a patient population: electronic pantograph assessment.
    Payne JA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Feb; 24(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 9061626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Trajectories of condylar points during nonworking side and protrusive movements of the mandible.
    Peck CC; Murray GM; Johnson CW; Klineberg IJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Sep; 82(3):322-31. PubMed ID: 10479260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Axiographic tracings of temporomandibular joint movements.
    Theusner J; Plesh O; Curtis DA; Hutton JE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 8429515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A specialized motion capture system for real-time analysis of mandibular movements using infrared cameras.
    Furtado DA; Pereira AA; Andrade Ade O; Bellomo DP; da Silva MR
    Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Feb; 12():17. PubMed ID: 23433470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A clinical comparative study of Cadiax Compact II and intraoral records using wax and addition silicone.
    Torabi K; Pour SR; Ahangari AH; Ghodsi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):541-3. PubMed ID: 25390868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Investigation of influencing variables on the computer-aided simulation of contacts in dynamic occlusion based on optically digitized plaster casts].
    Böröcz Z; Dirksen D; Thomas C; Runte C; Bollmann F; von Bally G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):111-6. PubMed ID: 15212195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the Cadiax Compact® II accuracy in recording preadjusted condylar inclinations on fully adjustable articulator.
    Ahangari AH; Torabi K; Pour SR; Ghodsi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):504-8. PubMed ID: 23151700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Instrumental functional diagnostics with the ROSY simulator.
    Edinger DH
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jan; 6(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 12838587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part I: Methodology.
    Stern N; Hatano Y; Kolling JN; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 3172004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Occlusion: 3. Articulators and related instruments.
    Milosevic A
    Dent Update; 2003 Nov; 30(9):511-5. PubMed ID: 14686191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Mandibular Movement Functions Using Instrumental Ultrasound System.
    Sójka A; Huber J; Kaczmarek E; Hędzelek W
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):123-128. PubMed ID: 26488230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of mandibular length on mouth opening.
    Dijkstra PU; Hof AL; Stegenga B; de Bont LG
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 26(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 10080308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electromyographic activity of the human lateral pterygoid muscle during contralateral and protrusive jaw movements.
    Murray GM; Orfanos T; Chan JY; Wanigaratne K; Klineberg IJ
    Arch Oral Biol; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-85. PubMed ID: 10217518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of changes in articulator settings on generated occlusal tracings. Part I: Condylar inclination and progressive side shift settings.
    Price RB; Kolling JN; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 2051358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of tooth contact on the path of condylar movements.
    Alsawaf MM; Garlapo DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 1507109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study.
    Pelletier LB; Campbell SD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 1774679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Variation in movement traces of the kinematic center of the temporomandibular joint.
    Naeije M; Huddleston Slater JJ; Lobbezoo F
    J Orofac Pain; 1999; 13(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 10425984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comment on condylar movement and mandibular rotation during jaw opening.
    Roth RH; Williams RE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Sep; 110(3):21A-23A. PubMed ID: 8814021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Condylar movement analysis in subjects with clinically normal temporomandibular joints, utilizing an amorphous sensor.
    Ioi H; Counts AL; Nanda RS
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Apr; 30(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 12631161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.