These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26389526)

  • 1. Using Classification and Regression Trees (CART) and random forests to analyze attrition: Results from two simulations.
    Hayes T; Usami S; Jacobucci R; McArdle JJ
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):911-29. PubMed ID: 26389526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.
    Lee BK; Lessler J; Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 19960510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attrition Bias Related to Missing Outcome Data: A Longitudinal Simulation Study.
    Lewin A; Brondeel R; Benmarhnia T; Thomas F; Chaix B
    Epidemiology; 2018 Jan; 29(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 28926372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Personalized Risk Prediction in Clinical Oncology Research: Applications and Practical Issues Using Survival Trees and Random Forests.
    Hu C; Steingrimsson JA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(2):333-349. PubMed ID: 29048993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods to account for attrition in longitudinal data: do they work? A simulation study.
    Kristman VL; Manno M; Côté P
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2005; 20(8):657-62. PubMed ID: 16151878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-CART: A tool to identify interactions between moderators in meta-analysis.
    Li X; Dusseldorp E; Meulman JJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):118-136. PubMed ID: 28130936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation in closed capture-recapture models when covariates are missing at random.
    Lee SM; Hwang WH; de Dieu Tapsoba J
    Biometrics; 2016 Dec; 72(4):1294-1304. PubMed ID: 26909877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential BART for imputation of missing covariates.
    Xu D; Daniels MJ; Winterstein AG
    Biostatistics; 2016 Jul; 17(3):589-602. PubMed ID: 26980459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction intervals with random forests.
    Roy MH; Larocque D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jan; 29(1):205-229. PubMed ID: 30786820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A random forest approach for competing risks based on pseudo-values.
    Mogensen UB; Gerds TA
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(18):3102-14. PubMed ID: 23508720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A two-step semiparametric method to accommodate sampling weights in multiple imputation.
    Zhou H; Elliott MR; Raghunathan TE
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):242-52. PubMed ID: 26393409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pathway analysis using random forests classification and regression.
    Pang H; Lin A; Holford M; Enerson BE; Lu B; Lawton MP; Floyd E; Zhao H
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Aug; 22(16):2028-36. PubMed ID: 16809386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weight trimming and propensity score weighting.
    Lee BK; Lessler J; Stuart EA
    PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e18174. PubMed ID: 21483818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bias in the study of prediction of change: a Monte Carlo simulation study of the effects of selective attrition and inappropriate modeling of regression toward the mean.
    Gustavson K; Borren I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():133. PubMed ID: 25519494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using decision trees to understand structure in missing data.
    Tierney NJ; Harden FA; Harden MJ; Mengersen KL
    BMJ Open; 2015 Jun; 5(6):e007450. PubMed ID: 26124509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran.
    Naghibi SA; Pourghasemi HR; Dixon B
    Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jan; 188(1):44. PubMed ID: 26687087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the ability of tree-based methods and logistic regression for the detection of SNP-SNP interaction.
    García-Magariños M; López-de-Ullibarri I; Cao R; Salas A
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 May; 73(Pt 3):360-9. PubMed ID: 19291098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple imputation for missing data via sequential regression trees.
    Burgette LF; Reiter JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 172(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 20841346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of a predictor's importance by Random Forests when there is missing data: risk prediction in liver surgery using laboratory data.
    Hapfelmeier A; Hothorn T; Riediger C; Ulm K
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):165-83. PubMed ID: 24914728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Methods for Creating Multiple Imputations of Nominal Variables.
    Lang KM; Wu W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(3):290-304. PubMed ID: 28266876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.