These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26389618)

  • 1. Sensory processing patterns predict the integration of information held in visual working memory.
    Lowe MX; Stevenson RA; Wilson KE; Ouslis NE; Barense MD; Cant JS; Ferber S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):294-301. PubMed ID: 26389618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hierarchical encoding in visual working memory: ensemble statistics bias memory for individual items.
    Brady TF; Alvarez GA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 21296808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contextual effects in visual working memory reveal hierarchically structured memory representations.
    Brady TF; Alvarez GA
    J Vis; 2015; 15(15):6. PubMed ID: 26575192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relating the perception of visual ensemble statistics to individual levels of autistic traits.
    Lowe MX; Stevenson RA; Barense MD; Cant JS; Ferber S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1667-1674. PubMed ID: 30088256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Capacity limit of ensemble perception of multiple spatially intermixed sets.
    Luo AX; Zhao J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2033-2047. PubMed ID: 30090978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct contributions of attention and working memory to visual statistical learning and ensemble processing.
    Hall MG; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1112-23. PubMed ID: 26010589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate metacognition for visual sensory memory representations.
    Vandenbroucke AR; Sligte IG; Barrett AB; Seth AK; Fahrenfort JJ; Lamme VA
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Apr; 25(4):861-73. PubMed ID: 24549293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What can half a million change detection trials tell us about visual working memory?
    Balaban H; Fukuda K; Luria R
    Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103984. PubMed ID: 31234117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A dynamic neural field model of visual working memory and change detection.
    Johnson JS; Spencer JP; Luck SJ; Schöner G
    Psychol Sci; 2009 May; 20(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 19368698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Compression in visual working memory: using statistical regularities to form more efficient memory representations.
    Brady TF; Konkle T; Alvarez GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):487-502. PubMed ID: 19883132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A probabilistic model of visual working memory: Incorporating higher order regularities into working memory capacity estimates.
    Brady TF; Tenenbaum JB
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):85-109. PubMed ID: 23230888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
    Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual features for perception, attention, and working memory: Toward a three-factor framework.
    Huang L
    Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():43-52. PubMed ID: 26299507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Where to start? Bottom-up attention improves working memory by determining encoding order.
    Ravizza SM; Uitvlugt MG; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1959-1968. PubMed ID: 27505226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parallel consolidation into visual working memory results in reduced precision representations.
    Rideaux R; Baker E; Edwards M
    Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():24-29. PubMed ID: 29913246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.
    Scalf PE; Dux PE; Marois R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2593-604. PubMed ID: 21281093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological evidence that top-down knowledge controls working memory processing for subsequent visual search.
    Kawashima T; Matsumoto E
    Neuroreport; 2016 Mar; 27(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 26872100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grouping and binding in visual short-term memory.
    Quinlan PT; Cohen DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1432-8. PubMed ID: 22449133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relational information in visual short-term memory: the structural gist.
    Vidal JR; Gauchou HL; Tallon-Baudry C; O'Regan JK
    J Vis; 2005 Mar; 5(3):244-56. PubMed ID: 15929649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.