459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26390125)
21. Comparison of the microbial communities in solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) reactors operated at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures.
Li YF; Nelson MC; Chen PH; Graf J; Li Y; Yu Z
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 Jan; 99(2):969-80. PubMed ID: 25194839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Biogas upgrading with hydrogenotrophic methanogenic biofilms.
Maegaard K; Garcia-Robledo E; Kofoed MVW; Agneessens LM; de Jonge N; Nielsen JL; Ottosen LDM; Nielsen LP; Revsbech NP
Bioresour Technol; 2019 Sep; 287():121422. PubMed ID: 31085427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Changing Feeding Regimes To Demonstrate Flexible Biogas Production: Effects on Process Performance, Microbial Community Structure, and Methanogenesis Pathways.
Mulat DG; Jacobi HF; Feilberg A; Adamsen AP; Richnow HH; Nikolausz M
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Jan; 82(2):438-49. PubMed ID: 26497462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance Analysis and Microbial Community Evolution of In Situ Biological Biogas Upgrading with Increasing H
Corbellini V; Feng C; Bellucci M; Catenacci A; Stella T; Espinoza-Tofalos A; Malpei F
Archaea; 2021; 2021():8894455. PubMed ID: 33628124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ex-situ biogas upgrading in thermophilic trickle bed reactors packed with micro-porous packing materials.
Ghofrani-Isfahani P; Tsapekos P; Peprah M; Kougias P; Zervas A; Zhu X; Yang Z; Jacobsen CS; Angelidaki I
Chemosphere; 2022 Jun; 296():133987. PubMed ID: 35176296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. High-Performance Biogas Upgrading Using a Biotrickling Filter and Hydrogenotrophic Methanogens.
Dupnock TL; Deshusses MA
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2017 Oct; 183(2):488-502. PubMed ID: 28808937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. H
Alfaro N; Fdz-Polanco M; Fdz-Polanco F; Díaz I
Bioresour Technol; 2019 May; 280():1-8. PubMed ID: 30743054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of hydrogen metabolism in commercial anaerobic digesters.
Kern T; Theiss J; Röske K; Rother M
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 May; 100(10):4699-710. PubMed ID: 26995607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Early response of methanogenic archaea to H
Kakuk B; Wirth R; Maróti G; Szuhaj M; Rakhely G; Laczi K; Kovács KL; Bagi Z
Microb Cell Fact; 2021 Jul; 20(1):127. PubMed ID: 34217274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Methanogenesis in thermophilic biogas reactors.
Ahring BK
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 1995; 67(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 7741531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis is the dominant methanogenic pathway in neotropical tank bromeliad wetlands.
Martinson GO; Pommerenke B; Brandt FB; Homeier J; Burneo JI; Conrad R
Environ Microbiol Rep; 2018 Feb; 10(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 29124879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of pH on ex-situ biomethanation with hydrogenotrophic methanogens under thermophilic and extreme-thermophilic conditions.
Chen L; Du S; Xie L
J Biosci Bioeng; 2021 Feb; 131(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33199191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ex-situ biogas upgrading in thermophilic up-flow reactors: The effect of different gas diffusers and gas retention times.
Ghofrani-Isfahani P; Tsapekos P; Peprah M; Kougias P; Zhu X; Kovalovszki A; Zervas A; Zha X; Jacobsen CS; Angelidaki I
Bioresour Technol; 2021 Nov; 340():125694. PubMed ID: 34352646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biological upgrading of biogas assisted with membrane supplied hydrogen gas in a three-phase upflow reactor.
Rao Y; Lin TY; Ling F; He Z
Bioresour Technol; 2024 Feb; 394():130260. PubMed ID: 38151211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Characteristics of in-situ hydrogen biomethanation at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures.
Jiang H; Wu F; Wang Y; Feng L; Zhou H; Li Y
Bioresour Technol; 2021 Oct; 337():125455. PubMed ID: 34320739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In-situ biogas upgrading with pulse H
Agneessens LM; Ottosen LDM; Voigt NV; Nielsen JL; de Jonge N; Fischer CH; Kofoed MVW
Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jun; 233():256-263. PubMed ID: 28285216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 454 pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters.
Sundberg C; Al-Soud WA; Larsson M; Alm E; Yekta SS; Svensson BH; Sørensen SJ; Karlsson A
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2013 Sep; 85(3):612-26. PubMed ID: 23678985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microbial activity response to hydrogen injection in thermophilic anaerobic digesters revealed by genome-centric metatranscriptomics.
Fontana A; Kougias PG; Treu L; Kovalovszki A; Valle G; Cappa F; Morelli L; Angelidaki I; Campanaro S
Microbiome; 2018 Oct; 6(1):194. PubMed ID: 30368244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Microbial community diversity in anaerobic reactors digesting turkey, chicken, and swine wastes.
Ziganshina EE; Belostotskiy DE; Shushlyaev RV; Miluykov VA; Vankov PY; Ziganshin AM
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):1464-772. PubMed ID: 25022523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of carbon monoxide on performance and microbial community of extreme-thermophilic hydrogenotrophic methanation in horizontal rotary bioreactor.
Zheng X; Zhou W; Min B; Zhou Y; Xie L
Bioresour Technol; 2023 Sep; 384():129248. PubMed ID: 37247793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
