BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26390368)

  • 1. A typology of time-scale mismatches and behavioral interventions to diagnose and solve conservation problems.
    Wilson RS; Hardisty DJ; Epanchin-Niell RS; Runge MC; Cottingham KL; Urban DL; Maguire LA; Hastings A; Mumby PJ; Peters DP
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 26390368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conservation success as a function of good alignment of social and ecological structures and processes.
    Bodin O; Crona B; Thyresson M; Golz AL; Tengö M
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Oct; 28(5):1371-9. PubMed ID: 24779516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management.
    Estévez RA; Anderson CB; Pizarro JC; Burgman MA
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 25155068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring Institutional Mechanisms for Scientific Input into the Management Cycle of the National Protected Area Network of Peru: Gaps and Opportunities.
    López-Rodríguez MD; Castro H; Arenas M; Requena-Mullor JM; Cano A; Valenzuela E; Cabello J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 60(6):1022-1041. PubMed ID: 28887588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incorporating geodiversity into conservation decisions.
    Comer PJ; Pressey RL; Hunter ML; Schloss CA; Buttrick SC; Heller NE; Tirpak JM; Faith DP; Cross MS; Shaffer ML
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):692-701. PubMed ID: 25923052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scale mismatches, conservation planning, and the value of social-network analyses.
    Guerrero AM; McAllister RR; Corcoran J; Wilson KA
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Feb; 27(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 23305381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mapping social-ecological vulnerability to inform local decision making.
    Thiault L; Marshall P; Gelcich S; Collin A; Chlous F; Claudet J
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):447-456. PubMed ID: 28714583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
    Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: a '4S' hierarchy.
    Dicks LV; Walsh JC; Sutherland WJ
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Nov; 29(11):607-13. PubMed ID: 25280588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integration of social and ecological sciences for natural resource decision making: challenges and opportunities.
    Robinson KF; Fuller AK; Stedman RC; Siemer WF; Decker DJ
    Environ Manage; 2019 May; 63(5):565-573. PubMed ID: 30739152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contextual influences on animal decision-making: Significance for behavior-based wildlife conservation and management.
    Owen MA; Swaisgood RR; Blumstein DT
    Integr Zool; 2017 Jan; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 27605354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of monitoring data to support conservation management and policy decisions in Micronesia.
    Montambault JR; Wongbusarakum S; Leberer T; Joseph E; Andrew W; Castro F; Nevitt B; Golbuu Y; Oldiais NW; Groves CR; Kostka W; Houk P
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1279-89. PubMed ID: 26036983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrated assessment of policy interventions for promoting sustainable irrigation in semi-arid environments: a hydro-economic modeling approach.
    Blanco-Gutiérrez I; Varela-Ortega C; Purkey DR
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():144-60. PubMed ID: 23732193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit decision framing as an unrecognized source of confusion in endangered species classification.
    Cummings JW; Converse SJ; Smith DR; Morey S; Runge MC
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1246-1254. PubMed ID: 29987850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using strategic foresight to assess conservation opportunity.
    Cook CN; Wintle BC; Aldrich SC; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1474-83. PubMed ID: 25381735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management.
    Groce JE; Farrelly MA; Jorgensen BS; Cook CN
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Feb; 33(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 29738621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insights for integrated conservation from attitudes of people toward protected areas near Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe.
    Guerbois C; Dufour AB; Mtare G; Fritz H
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):844-55. PubMed ID: 23866038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management.
    Martin J; Runge MC; Nichols JD; Lubow BC; Kendall WL
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Jul; 19(5):1079-90. PubMed ID: 19688917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of potential responses to invasive non-native species with structured decision making.
    Liu S; Walshe T; Long G; Cook D
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Jun; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 22519636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.