239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26390763)
21. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Displacement of Implant Abutments Following Initial and Repeated Torqueing.
Yilmaz B; Gilbert AB; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1011-8. PubMed ID: 26394335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Retrievable cemented implant restorations.
Chee WW; Torbati A; Albouy JP
J Prosthodont; 1998 Jun; 7(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 9743667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A simplified approach to implant restorations using innovative digital technology.
Brooks JH; Wicks RA; Hottel TL
J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2014; 94(2):41-4; quiz 45-6. PubMed ID: 25842466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Avots J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21649826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
Benic GI; Gallucci GO; Mokti M; Hämmerle CH; Weber HP; Jung RE
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 40(11):1052-61. PubMed ID: 24015975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical evaluation of the incidence of prosthetic complications in implant crowns constructed with UCLA castable abutments. A cohort follow-up study.
Montero J; Manzano G; Beltrán D; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ; Castillo-Oyagüe R
J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1081-9. PubMed ID: 22982530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Immediate provisionalization with a CAD/CAM interim abutment and crown: a guided soft tissue healing technique.
Proussaefs P
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 25438739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of an occlusal screw-access hole on the fracture resistance of permanently cemented implant crowns: a laboratory study.
Shadid RM; Abu-Naba'a L; Al-Omari WM; Asfar KR; El Masoud BM
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 21519576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Single-Unit Cement-Retained Implant Restorations: Strategies, Protocols, and Techniques.
Schoenbaum T; Stevenson RG; Moshaverinia A
Dent Today; 2017 Jun; 36(6):64-8. PubMed ID: 29231669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cemented Single Crown Retention on Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.
Rues S; Fugina M; Rammelsberg P; Kappel S
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(2):133-135. PubMed ID: 28267819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A simple, permanent index for abutment screw access for cemented implant-supported crowns.
Hill EE
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):313-4. PubMed ID: 17547952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of the Unfilled Space Size of the Abutment Screw Access Hole on the Extruded Excess Cement and Retention of Single Implant Zirconia Crowns.
Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Qarni MN
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 28102922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fabrication of a cement- and screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Rajan M; Gunaseelan R
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):578-80. PubMed ID: 15583566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Single-tooth implant reconstructions: esthetic factors influencing the decision between titanium and zirconia abutments in anterior regions.
Sailer I; Zembic A; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Mattiola A
Eur J Esthet Dent; 2007; 2(3):296-310. PubMed ID: 19655552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A method for restoring facially inclined implants with a screw-retained restoration.
Takanashi K; Lee JM; Sedler A; Aalam AK
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):269-71. PubMed ID: 23566609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
