These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26390872)

  • 1. The logic-bias effect: The role of effortful processing in the resolution of belief-logic conflict.
    Howarth S; Handley SJ; Walsh C
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):330-49. PubMed ID: 26390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When fast logic meets slow belief: Evidence for a parallel-processing model of belief bias.
    Trippas D; Thompson VA; Handley SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):539-552. PubMed ID: 28028779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Logic, beliefs, and instruction: a test of the default interventionist account of belief bias.
    Handley SJ; Newstead SE; Trippas D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 21058879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in working memory capacity and resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1471-1484. PubMed ID: 27173000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A diffusion model analysis of belief bias: Different cognitive mechanisms explain how cognitive abilities and thinking styles contribute to conflict resolution in reasoning.
    Schubert AL; Ferreira MB; Mata A; Riemenschneider B
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104629. PubMed ID: 33626418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A contribute to the default-interventionist and parallel accounts in deductive reasoning. The effect of decisional styles on logic and belief.
    Fabio RA; Verzì D; Gangemi A
    J Gen Psychol; 2024; 151(2):209-222. PubMed ID: 37526357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual processing in reasoning: two systems but one reasoner.
    De Neys W
    Psychol Sci; 2006 May; 17(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 16683931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Highly reflective reasoners show no signs of belief inhibition.
    Svedholm-Häkkinen AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jan; 154():69-76. PubMed ID: 25499057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibitory mechanism of the matching heuristic in syllogistic reasoning.
    Tse PP; Moreno Ríos S; García-Madruga JA; Bajo Molina MT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():95-106. PubMed ID: 25463549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using forced choice to test belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Trippas D; Verde MF; Handley SJ
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):586-600. PubMed ID: 25218460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Logic and belief across the lifespan: the rise and fall of belief inhibition during syllogistic reasoning.
    De Neys W; Van Gelder E
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jan; 12(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 19120420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Working memory, metacognitive uncertainty, and belief bias in syllogistic reasoning.
    Quayle JD; Ball LJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):1202-23. PubMed ID: 11131820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do smart people have better intuitions?
    Thompson VA; Pennycook G; Trippas D; Evans JSBT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jul; 147(7):945-961. PubMed ID: 29975089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process.
    Hayes BK; Stephens RG; Ngo J; Dunn JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1333-1351. PubMed ID: 29389195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A test of two processes: The effect of training on deductive and inductive reasoning.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK; Kalish ML
    Cognition; 2020 Jun; 199():104223. PubMed ID: 32092549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The SDT model of belief bias: complexity, time, and cognitive ability mediate the effects of believability.
    Trippas D; Handley SJ; Verde MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1393-402. PubMed ID: 23565791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rule-based reasoning is fast and belief-based reasoning can be slow: Challenging current explanations of belief-bias and base-rate neglect.
    Newman IR; Gibb M; Thompson VA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1154-1170. PubMed ID: 28191989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Belief inhibition in children's reasoning: memory-based evidence.
    Steegen S; De Neys W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jun; 112(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 22402412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reasoning under time pressure. A study of causal conditional inference.
    Evans JS; Handley SJ; Bacon AM
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 19261582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.