359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26391015)
1. Changing Attitude Toward Radiation Carcinogenesis and Prospects for Novel Low-Dose Radiation Treatments.
Socol Y; Welsh JS
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Dec; 15(6):732-736. PubMed ID: 26391015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Commentary: ethical issues of current health-protection policies on low-dose ionizing radiation.
Socol Y; Dobrzyński L; Doss M; Feinendegen LE; Janiak MK; Miller ML; Sanders CL; Scott BR; Ulsh B; Vaiserman A
Dose Response; 2014 May; 12(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 24910586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
Charles MW
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection.
Laurier D; Billarand Y; Klokov D; Leuraud K
J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jun; 43(2):. PubMed ID: 37339605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward improved ionizing radiation safety standards.
Raabe OG
Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 21617395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does Imaging Technology Cause Cancer? Debunking the Linear No-Threshold Model of Radiation Carcinogenesis.
Siegel JA; Welsh JS
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Apr; 15(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 25824269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biological Effects From Low Doses and Dose Rates of Ionizing Radiation: Science in the Service of Protecting Humans, a Synopsis.
Feinendegen LE; Cuttler JM
Health Phys; 2018 Jun; 114(6):623-626. PubMed ID: 29521814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose and dose-rate effects of ionizing radiation: a discussion in the light of radiological protection.
Rühm W; Woloschak GE; Shore RE; Azizova TV; Grosche B; Niwa O; Akiba S; Ono T; Suzuki K; Iwasaki T; Ban N; Kai M; Clement CH; Bouffler S; Toma H; Hamada N
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2015 Nov; 54(4):379-401. PubMed ID: 26343037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
Breckow J
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radar commentary: Use of linear no-threshold hypothesis in radiation protection regulation in the United States.
Siegel JA; Stabin MG
Health Phys; 2012 Jan; 102(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 22134084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
Mossman KL
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.
Calabrese EJ
Arch Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 87(9):1621-33. PubMed ID: 23887208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Basis of radiation protection].
Roth J; Schweizer P; Gückel C
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jun; 126(26):1157-71. PubMed ID: 8711464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():435-451. PubMed ID: 28109526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.
Brenner DJ; Sachs RK
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 16470411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation?
Wall BF; Kendall GM; Edwards AA; Bouffler S; Muirhead CR; Meara JR
Br J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 79(940):285-94. PubMed ID: 16585719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Future of Radiation Protection Regulations.
Doss M
Health Phys; 2016 Mar; 110(3):274-5. PubMed ID: 26808881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.
Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 16468064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
