These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2639117)

  • 1. The Lynn Maxilla Rotator Combination Appliance and Lynn Archial Face Bow.
    Lynn JM
    Funct Orthod; 1989; 6(4):4-13. PubMed ID: 2639117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Realities of craniofacial growth modification.
    Kluemper GT; Spalding PM
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):23-51. PubMed ID: 11905336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The effect of orthopedic forces on the craniofacial complex during maxillary traction].
    Yukinari T; Ichikawa K; Nakagawa M; Komogashira K; Kawagoe H; Itoh T; Matsumoto M
    Fukuoka Shika Daigaku Gakkai Zasshi; 1986; 13(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 3464460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distal movement of the maxillary molar using an active removable appliance and extraoral force: a case report.
    Johnson BE
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8190880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective study of the treatment effects of a removable appliance with palatal crib combined with high-pull chincup therapy in anterior open-bite patients.
    Pedrin F; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Torres F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 16527639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 2 modifications of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples.
    Parkin NA; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 11395699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonextraction treatment of a skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    León-Salazar V; Janson G; de Freitas MR; de Almeida RR; León-Salazar R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):736-45. PubMed ID: 19892292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guiding occlusal development with functional appliances.
    Nielsen IL
    Aust Orthod J; 1996 Oct; 14(3):133-42. PubMed ID: 9528411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-surgical alternative in the treatment of skeletal Class III problems.
    Jefferson Y
    J N J Dent Assoc; 1995; 66(4):21-7, 29. PubMed ID: 9520715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
    Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonsurgical orthodontic treatment of an adolescent girl with Class III malocclusion and asymmetric maxillary narrowing.
    Hamamci N; Başaran G; Tümen EC; Ozdemir E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 18675215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extraoral traction to the maxilla with face mask: a follow-up of 17 consecutively treated patients with and without cleft lip and palate.
    Sarnäs KV; Rune B
    Cleft Palate J; 1987 Apr; 24(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 3472692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maxillary protraction with and without maxillary expansion: a finite element analysis of sutural stresses.
    Gautam P; Valiathan A; Adhikari R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 19732670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in the permanent dentition.
    Varlik SK; Iscan HN
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 18678761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The effect of the J. Delaire orthopedic traction face-bow on the facial skeleton: results, new therapeutic trends].
    Salagnac JM
    Orthod Fr; 1988; 59 Pt 2():591-601. PubMed ID: 3271975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skeletal types: key to unraveling the mystery of facial beauty and its biologic significance.
    Jefferson Y
    J Gen Orthod; 1996 Jun; 7(2):7-25. PubMed ID: 9508852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face mask therapy and conventional orthodontic treatment for anterior crossbite with cleft lip and palate: a case report.
    Komatsu M; Komori A; Koike N; Nakahara R
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 18092521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.