195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26391235)
1. Rater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Single and Dual Bubble Inclinometry to Assess Cervical Lateral Flexion.
Lachtman DS; Bartha DA; Beltran MM; Dominguez DN; Messerli AR; Miller SE; Davis AM; Nelson-Wong E
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2015 Oct; 38(8):572-80. PubMed ID: 26391235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and Validity of Cervical Range of Motion and Muscle Strength Testing.
Kubas C; Chen YW; Echeverri S; McCann SL; Denhoed MJ; Walker CJ; Kennedy CN; Reid WD
J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1087-1096. PubMed ID: 27467513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility and validity of digital inclinometry for measuring cervical range of motion in normal subjects.
Prushansky T; Deryi O; Jabarreen B
Physiother Res Int; 2010 Mar; 15(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19554615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement and reliability of two non-invasive methods for assessing cervical range of motion among young adults.
Florêncio LL; Pereira PA; Silva ER; Pegoretti KS; Gonçalves MC; Bevilaqua-Grossi D
Rev Bras Fisioter; 2010; 14(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 20464161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Smartphone Inclinometer Application to Quantify Cervical Spine Mobility.
Guidetti L; Placentino U; Baldari C
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1359-E1366. PubMed ID: 26905732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion.
Bedekar N; Suryawanshi M; Rairikar S; Sancheti P; Shyam A
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2014; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 24029833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smartphone Inclinometry Is a Valid and Reliable Tool for Measuring Frontal Plane Tibial Alignment in Healthy and Osteoarthritic Knees.
Tse CTF; Charlton JM; Lam J; Ho J; Bears J; Serek A; Hunt MA
Phys Ther; 2021 Jul; 101(7):. PubMed ID: 33710269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical validity and stability of active and passive cervical range of motion with regard to total and unilateral uniplanar motion.
Lantz CA; Chen J; Buch D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jun; 24(11):1082-9. PubMed ID: 10361657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of normal lumbar flexion with surface inclinometry. A comparison of three methods.
Rondinelli R; Murphy J; Esler A; Marciano T; Cholmakjian C
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 Aug; 71(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 1642821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reliability of the three-dimensional FASTRAK measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects.
Jordan K; Dziedzic K; Jones PW; Ong BN; Dawes PT
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2000 Apr; 39(4):382-8. PubMed ID: 10817770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants.
Tousignant-Laflamme Y; Boutin N; Dion AM; Vallée CA
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jul; 10(1):69. PubMed ID: 23829201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of range-of-motion in infants with indications of upper cervical dysfunction using the Flexion-Rotation-Test and Lateral-Flexion-Test: a blinded inter-rater reliability study in a clinical practice setting.
Driehuis F; Keijsers NLW; Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG; De Bie RA; Staal JB; Hoogeboom TJ
J Man Manip Ther; 2021 Feb; 29(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 32282288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of the Cervical Spine Device for the Assessment of Cervical Spine Range of Motion in Asymptomatic Participants.
Mangone M; Bernetti A; Germanotta M; Di Sipio E; Razzano C; Ioppolo F; Santilli V; Venditto T; Paoloni M
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2018 May; 41(4):342-349. PubMed ID: 29751851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrarater and Interrater Reliability of the Flexion Rotation Test and Cervical Range of Motion in People With Migraine.
Oliveira-Souza AIS; Carvalho GF; Florêncio LL; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C; Dach F; Bevilaqua-Grossi D
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2020; 43(9):874-881. PubMed ID: 32861519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interrater reliability of the craniocervical flexion test in asymptomatic individuals--a cross-sectional study.
Arumugam A; Mani R; Raja K
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 May; 34(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 21621726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of the Microgate Gyko for measuring range of motion of the low back.
Hamersma DT; Hofste A; Rijken NHM; Roe Of Rohé M; Oosterveld FGJ; Soer R
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2020 Feb; 45():102091. PubMed ID: 31735439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intrarater and interrater reliability of 22 clinical measures associated with lower quarter malalignment.
Leard JS; Crane BA; Ball KA
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 May; 32(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 19447263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Zebris versus Myrin: a comparative study between a three-dimensional ultrasound movement analysis and an inclinometer/compass method: intradevice reliability, concurrent validity, intertester comparison, intratester reliability, and intraindividual variability.
Malmström EM; Karlberg M; Melander A; Magnusson M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Nov; 28(21):E433-40. PubMed ID: 14595170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new iPhone application for measuring active craniocervical range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain: a reliability and validity study.
Pourahmadi MR; Bagheri R; Taghipour M; Takamjani IE; Sarrafzadeh J; Mohseni-Bandpei MA
Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):447-457. PubMed ID: 28890223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
