These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2639235)

  • 1. [Cephalometric postural parameters and dental malocclusion].
    Capurso U; Garino GB; Rotolo L; Verna CA
    Mondo Ortod; 1989; 14(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 2639235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molar bite force in relation to occlusion, craniofacial dimensions, and head posture in pre-orthodontic children.
    Sonnesen L; Bakke M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 15743864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cephalometric study of the results of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusion].
    Antonini A; Vichi M; Defraia E
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1989; 9(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 2639521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Delaire's architectural and structural cranio-facial analysis in cephalometric evaluation].
    Doğan S; Ertürk N
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 2489130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of Class III problems begins with differential diagnosis of anterior crossbites.
    Ngan P; Hu AM; Fields HW
    Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(6):386-95. PubMed ID: 9348603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Cephalometric study of the vertical dimension of cases of class II, division I malocclusion, demonstrating a strong incisor supraclusion and treated by the Bimler therapeutic method].
    Stromboni Y; Mosse A
    Orthod Fr; 1973; 44(2):129-38. PubMed ID: 4534445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric variables as predictors of Class II treatment outcome.
    Kim JC; Mascarenhas AK; Joo BH; Vig KW; Beck FM; Vig PS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):636-40. PubMed ID: 11113798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusions.
    Polat OO; Kaya B
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 17973688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cranio-cervical posture: a factor in the development and function of the dentofacial structures.
    Solow B; Sandham A
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):447-56. PubMed ID: 12407940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The importance of determination of jaw position in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning for adult patients.
    Chang FH; Chen KC; Shiau YY
    Dent Clin North Am; 1997 Jan; 41(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 9023062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Features and treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with severe lateral mandibular shift and asymmetric vertical dimension.
    Kondo E
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 15615138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups.
    Fattahi HR; Pakshir HR; Hedayati Z
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Oct; 28(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 16763087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Selection criteria for orthopedic, orthodontic and surgical treatment of class III malocclusion using a simplified cephalometric analysis from the dental school at Cagliari].
    Tenti FV
    Mondo Ortod; 1981; 6(2):35-40. PubMed ID: 6949029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of two skeletal and dental class III cases: 10 years postretention.
    Doğan S; Sabah ME
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15615139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Head posture in lateral roentgen image].
    Hirschfelder U; Hirschfelder H
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1991 Oct; 52(5):302-9. PubMed ID: 1757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence of muscle role over the cranio-facial skull development in Angle's Class III dental malocclusion under the clinical rest position.
    Gomes AC; Vitti M; Regalo SC; Semprini M; Siéssere S; Watanabe PC; Palomari ET
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008; 48(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 19097473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive value of morphologic parameters for successful correction of Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Zentner A; Peylo S; Brothag D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 12637900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A cephalometric evaluation of dento-skeletal structures of young Class II, division 1 Brazilian white patients of Mediterranean origin].
    Viana do Vale DM; Rodrigues Martins D
    Ortodontia; 1987; 20(1-2):5-17. PubMed ID: 3506994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The A line for orthodontic diagnosis.
    Alvarez A
    Tex Dent J; 2002 Jul; 119(7):600-5. PubMed ID: 12138532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.