BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26392751)

  • 1. Efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis using a conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
    Torkildsen G; Narvekar A; Bergmann M
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1703-13. PubMed ID: 26392751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pooled analysis of two studies evaluating efficacy and safety of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.77% in patients with allergic conjunctivitis.
    McLaurin E; Bergmann M; Narvekar A; Adewale A; Gomes P; Torkildsen G
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():1089-1097. PubMed ID: 28652694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multicenter evaluation of the efficacy and duration of action of alcaftadine 0.25% and olopatadine 0.2% in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Ackerman S; D'Ambrosio F; Greiner JV; Villanueva L; Ciolino JB; Hollander DA
    J Asthma Allergy; 2013; 6():43-52. PubMed ID: 24109191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phase 3 Randomized Double-Masked Study of Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily 0.77% Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis Using the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model.
    McLaurin E; Narvekar A; Gomes P; Adewale A; Torkildsen G
    Cornea; 2015 Oct; 34(10):1245-51. PubMed ID: 26266427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
    Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
    Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Mah FS; Rosenwasser LJ; Townsend WD; Greiner JV; Bensch G
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jun; 23(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17559743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Abelson MB; Greiner JV
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy and response with olopatadine versus epinastine in ocular allergic symptoms: a post hoc analysis of data from a conjunctival allergen challenge study.
    Finegold I; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Epstein AB
    Clin Ther; 2006 Oct; 28(10):1630-8. PubMed ID: 17157118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of olopatadine ophthalmic solution 0.2% in reducing signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
    Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Pasquine T; Edwards MR; Gross RD; Robertson SM
    Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17883910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined analysis of two studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate olopatadine hydrochloride, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity.
    Abelson MB; Spitalny L
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 9645717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
    Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
    Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
    Abelson MB; Turner D
    Clin Ther; 2003 Mar; 25(3):931-47. PubMed ID: 12852709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Greiner JV; Udell IJ
    Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A multicenter, double-masked, randomized evaluation of olopatadine 0.2% using the conjunctival allergen challenge model in Japanese patients with allergic conjunctivitis].
    Ohno S;
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Dec; 116(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 23379201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and comfort of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Butrus S; Greiner JV; Discepola M; Finegold I
    Clin Ther; 2000 Dec; 22(12):1462-72. PubMed ID: 11192137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and loteprednol etabonate 0.2% ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
    Berdy GJ; Stoppel JO; Epstein AB
    Clin Ther; 2002 Jun; 24(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 12117082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study of the mast cell-stabilizing effects of treatment with olopatadine in the conjunctival allergen challenge model in humans.
    Leonardi A; Abelson MB
    Clin Ther; 2003 Oct; 25(10):2539-52. PubMed ID: 14667955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
    Crampton HJ
    Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1975-87. PubMed ID: 12946545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.