226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26393912)
1. Efficacy Management of Urolithiasis: Flexible Ureteroscopy versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.
Tauber V; Wohlmuth M; Hochmuth A; Schimetta W; Krause FS
Urol Int; 2015; 95(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 26393912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultra-Mini PCNL, Flexible Ureteroscopy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy on the Treatment of 1-2 cm Lower Pole Renal Calculi.
Zhang H; Hong TY; Li G; Jiang N; Hu C; Cui X; Chu C; Zhao JL
Urol Int; 2019; 102(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 30352443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pediatric extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: its efficiency at various locations in the upper tract.
Hammad FT; Kaya M; Kazim E
J Endourol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 19187013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of kidney stones in patients with a solitary kidney.
Yuruk E; Binbay M; Ozgor F; Sekerel L; Berberoglu Y; Muslumanoglu AY
J Endourol; 2015 Apr; 29(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 25268731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Urolithiasis in Horseshoe Kidney Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yi X; Cao D; You P; Xiong X; Zheng X; Jin T; Peng G; Xu H; Liao D; Wei Q; Li H; Yang L; Ai J
Front Surg; 2021; 8():726233. PubMed ID: 34760915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a new choice for intrarenal stone patients.
Xu C; Song RJ; Jiang MJ; Qin C; Wang XL; Zhang W
Urol Int; 2015; 94(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 25074621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Urolithiasis Treatment in Australia: The Age of Ureteroscopic Intervention.
Perera M; Papa N; Kinnear N; Wetherell D; Lawrentschuk N; Webb D; Bolton D
J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1194-1199. PubMed ID: 27629239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive factors and management of steinstrasse after shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis--a multivariate analysis study.
Onal B; Citgez S; Tansu N; Demirdag C; Dogan C; Gonul B; Demirkesen O; Obek C; Erozenci A
Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1127-31. PubMed ID: 22999455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.
Hautmann S; Friedrich MG; Fernandez S; Steuber T; Hammerer P; Braun PM; Jünemann KP; Huland H
Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper tract urolithiasis.
Weaver J; Monga M
Curr Opin Urol; 2014 Mar; 24(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 24378978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones.
Ito H; Sakamaki K; Kawahara T; Terao H; Yasuda K; Kuroda S; Yao M; Kubota Y; Matsuzaki J
BJU Int; 2015 Mar; 115(3):446-51. PubMed ID: 24731157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic Management of Urolithiasis in the Horseshoe Kidney.
Blackburne AT; Rivera ME; Gettman MT; Patterson DE; Krambeck AE
Urology; 2016 Apr; 90():45-9. PubMed ID: 26772644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing urologist treatment preference in surgical management of stone disease.
Childs MA; Rangel LJ; Lingeman JE; Krambeck AE
Urology; 2012 May; 79(5):996-1003. PubMed ID: 22245295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress?
Kerbl K; Rehman J; Landman J; Lee D; Sundaram C; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 2002 Jun; 16(5):281-8. PubMed ID: 12184077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pediatric shockwave lithotripsy: size matters!
Wadhwa P; Aron M; Seth A; Dogra PN; Hemal AK; Gupta NP
J Endourol; 2007 Feb; 21(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 17338609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
