326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26394334)
1. Evaluation of New Bone Formation and Osseointegration Around Subperiosteal Titanium Implants with Histometry and Nanoindentation.
Claffey N; Bashara H; O'Reilly P; Polyzois I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1004-10. PubMed ID: 26394334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical property assessment of bone healing around a titanium-zirconium alloy dental implant.
Anchieta RB; Baldassarri M; Guastaldi F; Tovar N; Janal MN; Gottlow J; Dard M; Jimbo R; Coelho PG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):913-9. PubMed ID: 23527994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical properties of bone tissues surrounding dental implant systems with different treatments and healing periods.
Kim DG; Kwon HJ; Jeong YH; Kosel E; Lee DJ; Han JS; Kim HL; Kim DJ
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2211-2220. PubMed ID: 26832783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Lee SG; Choi BJ; Suh JY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultraviolet-C irradiation to titanium implants increases peri-implant bone formation without impeding mineralization in a rabbit femur model.
Yamazaki M; Yamada M; Ishizaki K; Sakurai K
Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 25645878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Healing response of cortical and cancellous bone around titanium implants.
Lee JE; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Han CH; Lee SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):655-62. PubMed ID: 19885405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osteogenesis and morphology of the peri-implant bone facing dental implants.
Franchi M; Orsini E; Trire A; Quaranta M; Martini D; Piccari GG; Ruggeri A; Ottani V
ScientificWorldJournal; 2004 Dec; 4():1083-95. PubMed ID: 15632988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trabecular bone response to titanium implants with a thin carbonate-containing apatite coating applied using the molecular precursor method.
Hayakawa T; Takahashi K; Yoshinari M; Okada H; Yamamoto H; Sato M; Nemoto K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 17190294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions.
Bosshardt DD; Chappuis V; Buser D
Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 28000277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants coated with fibroblast growth factor-fibronectin (FGF-FN) fusion protein.
Park JM; Koak JY; Jang JH; Han CH; Kim SK; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):859-66. PubMed ID: 17190295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of the osseointegration of porous tantalum implants.
Fraser D; Funkenbusch P; Ercoli C; Meirelles L
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):811-820. PubMed ID: 31703918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration of fiber-reinforced composite implants: histological and ultrastructural observations.
Ballo AM; Cekic-Nagas I; Ergun G; Lassila L; Palmquist A; Borchardt P; Lausmaa J; Thomsen P; Vallittu PK; Närhi TO
Dent Mater; 2014 Dec; 30(12):e384-95. PubMed ID: 25182369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs.
Valderrama P; Bornstein MM; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Higginbottom FL; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1025-34. PubMed ID: 21142981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium.
Butz F; Aita H; Wang CJ; Ogawa T
J Dent Res; 2006 Jun; 85(6):560-5. PubMed ID: 16723656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
