288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26394558)
1. The importance of surgical margins in breast cancer.
O'Kelly Priddy CM; Forte VA; Lang JE
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 113(3):256-63. PubMed ID: 26394558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of intra-operative margin management techniques in breast-conserving surgery: a standardised approach reduces the likelihood of residual disease without increasing operative time.
Bolger JC; Solon JG; Khan SA; Hill AD; Power CP
Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 23649303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complete excision with narrow margins provides equivalent local control to wider excision in breast conservation for invasive cancer.
Tang SSK; Rapisarda F; Nerurkar A; Osin P; MacNeill F; Smith I; Johnston S; Ross G; Mohammed K; Gui GPH
BJS Open; 2019 Apr; 3(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 30957062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Who should not undergo breast conservation?
Nijenhuis MV; Rutgers EJ
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S110-4. PubMed ID: 24074770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rates of residual disease with close but negative margins in breast cancer surgery.
Garvey EM; Senior DA; Pockaj BA; Wasif N; Dueck AC; McCullough AE; Ocal IT; Gray RJ
Breast; 2015 Aug; 24(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 25845608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Omitting re-excision for focally positive margins after breast-conserving surgery does not impair disease-free and overall survival.
Vos EL; Siesling S; Baaijens MHA; Verhoef C; Jager A; Voogd AC; Koppert LB
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(1):157-167. PubMed ID: 28389735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving local control with breast-conserving therapy: a 27-year single-institution experience.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Buchholz TA; Mirza N; Singletary SE; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Ames FC; Sahin AA; Meric-Bernstam F
Cancer; 2005 Jul; 104(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 15912514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The preferred treatment for young women with breast cancer--mastectomy versus breast conservation.
van Nes JG; van de Velde CJ
Breast; 2006 Dec; 15 Suppl 2():S3-10. PubMed ID: 17382859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of safe margins in pathology examination in breast oncosurgery].
Trnková M
Rozhl Chir; 2014 Feb; 93(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 24702295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast Conservation and Negative Margins in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: The Impact of Oncoplastic Surgery and Shave Margins in 358 Patients.
Mukhtar RA; Wong J; Piper M; Zhu Z; Fahrner-Scott K; Mamounas M; Sbitany H; Alvarado M; Foster R; Ewing C; Esserman L
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(11):3165-3170. PubMed ID: 30054826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The MarginProbe® System: An Innovative Approach to Reduce the Incidence of Positive Margins Found After Lumpectomy.
Gola S; Doyle-Lindrud S
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Dec; 20(6):598-599. PubMed ID: 27857263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MarginProbe© reduces the rate of re-excision following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer.
Blohmer JU; Tanko J; Kueper J; Groß J; Völker R; Machleidt A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 294(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 26796680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Margin re-excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer: A cost analysis using a decision tree model.
Abe SE; Hill JS; Han Y; Walsh K; Symanowski JT; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Flippo-Morton T; Sarantou T; Forster M; White RL
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 112(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 26374088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Definition and Management of Positive Margins for Invasive Breast Cancer.
Nayyar A; Gallagher KK; McGuire KP
Surg Clin North Am; 2018 Aug; 98(4):761-771. PubMed ID: 30005772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing long-term local recurrence rates of surgical and non-surgical management of close anterior margins in breast conserving surgery.
Boundouki G; Wong Sik Hee JR; Croghan N; Stocking K; Pieri A; Critchley A; Kirwan CC; Harvey JR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 176(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 31012033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local control in 118 consecutive high-risk breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Vordermark D; Lackenbauer A; Wulf J; Guckenberger M; Flentje M
Oncol Rep; 2007 Nov; 18(5):1335-9. PubMed ID: 17914594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
