These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26394641)

  • 1. What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty?
    de Steiger RN; Lorimer M; Solomon M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3860-6. PubMed ID: 26394641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Bingham R; Corfield S; Harries D; Harris IA; Vince KG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Jan; 482(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 37339166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What Can We Learn From Surgeons Who Perform THA and TKA and Have the Lowest Revision Rates? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Lorimer M; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):464-481. PubMed ID: 34677162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Harris I; Lorimer MF; Graves SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1952-1970. PubMed ID: 35980886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are the First or the Second Hips of Staged Bilateral THAs More Similar to Unilateral Procedures? A Study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Bülow E; Nemes S; Rolfson O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1262-1270. PubMed ID: 32168059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the prognosis of revision total hip arthroplasty in patients 55 years and younger?
    Adelani MA; Crook K; Barrack RL; Maloney WJ; Clohisy JC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May; 472(5):1518-25. PubMed ID: 24249534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.
    Tanzer M; Graves SE; Peng A; Shimmin AJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 29683803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Use of Computer Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Reduced Rate of Revision for Dislocation: A Study of 6,912 Navigated THA Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Agarwal S; Eckhard L; Walter WL; Peng A; Hatton A; Donnelly B; de Steiger R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Oct; 103(20):1900-1905. PubMed ID: 34143758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are Hooded, Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Associated with a Reduced Risk of Revision After THA?
    Bauze A; Agrawal S; Cuthbert A; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 31136427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Dyer C; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Surgical Approach Affect Patient-reported Function After Primary THA?
    Graves SC; Dropkin BM; Keeney BJ; Lurie JD; Tomek IM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 26620966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the Direct Anterior Approach to THA Cost-effective? A Markov Analysis.
    Berg AR; Held MB; Jiao B; Swart E; Lakra A; Cooper HJ; Shah RP; Geller JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 480(8):1518-1532. PubMed ID: 35254344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Is the Frequency of Fracture of Ceramic Components in THA? Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017.
    Hallan G; Fenstad AM; Furnes O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1254-1261. PubMed ID: 32348085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach?
    Rathod PA; Bhalla S; Deshmukh AJ; Rodriguez JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1877-85. PubMed ID: 24549773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.
    Marshall DA; Pykerman K; Werle J; Lorenzetti D; Wasylak T; Noseworthy T; Dick DA; O'Connor G; Sundaram A; Heintzbergen S; Frank C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jul; 472(7):2217-30. PubMed ID: 24700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.