These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26395366)

  • 1. On replacing the manual measurement of ACR phantom images performed by MRI technologists with an automated measurement approach.
    Panych LP; Chiou JY; Qin L; Kimbrell VL; Bussolari L; Mulkern RV
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):843-52. PubMed ID: 26395366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic Analysis of ACR Phantom Images in MRI.
    Alaya IB; Mars M
    Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(7):892-901. PubMed ID: 33059559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRI quality assurance using the ACR phantom in a multi-unit imaging center.
    Ihalainen TM; Lönnroth NT; Peltonen JI; Uusi-Simola JK; Timonen MH; Kuusela LJ; Savolainen SE; Sipilä OE
    Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):966-72. PubMed ID: 21767198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fully-automated quality assurance in multi-center studies using MRI phantom measurements.
    Davids M; Zöllner FG; Ruttorf M; Nees F; Flor H; Schumann G; Schad LR;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 32(6):771-80. PubMed ID: 24602825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality assessment of a 1.5T dedicated magnetic resonance-simulator for radiotherapy with a flexible radio frequency coil setting using the standard American College of Radiology magnetic resonance imaging phantom test.
    Wong OL; Yuan J; Yu SK; Cheung KY
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2017 Apr; 7(2):205-214. PubMed ID: 28516046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Automated Method for Quality Control in MRI Systems: Methods and Considerations.
    Epistatou AC; Tsalafoutas IA; Delibasis KK
    J Imaging; 2020 Oct; 6(10):. PubMed ID: 34460552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated low-contrast pattern recognition algorithm for magnetic resonance image quality assessment.
    Ehman MO; Bao Z; Stiving SO; Kasam M; Lanners D; Peterson T; Jonsgaard R; Carter R; McGee KP
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4009-4024. PubMed ID: 28543961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated Quantitative Analysis of American College of Radiology PET Phantom Images.
    DiFilippo FP; Patel M; Patel S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Sep; 47(3):249-254. PubMed ID: 31019038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of quality assurance guidelines comparing the American College of Radiology and American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group 284 for magnetic resonance simulation.
    Buatti JS; Gallagher KJ; Bailey I; Griglock T; Heard M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13730. PubMed ID: 35851720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results.
    Chen CC; Wan YL; Wai YY; Liu HL
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Dec; 17(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 15692871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical Note: Independent component analysis for quality assurance in functional MRI.
    Astrakas LG; Kallistis NS; Kalef-Ezra JA
    Med Phys; 2016 Feb; 43(2):983-92. PubMed ID: 26843258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated analysis of the American College of Radiology mammographic accreditation phantom images.
    Brooks KW; Trueblood JH; Kearfott KJ; Lawton DT
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):709-23. PubMed ID: 9167162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality control of CT systems by automated monitoring of key performance indicators: a two-year study.
    Nowik P; Bujila R; Poludniowski G; Fransson A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):254–265. PubMed ID: 26219012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proposed changes to the ACR phantom filling procedure for more accurate and consistent activity concentrations.
    Beattie BJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 20(2):154-156. PubMed ID: 30652408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel DTI-QA tool: Automated metric extraction exploiting the sphericity of an agar filled phantom.
    Chavez S; Viviano J; Zamyadi M; Kingsley PB; Kochunov P; Strother S; Voineskos A
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():28-39. PubMed ID: 29054737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Low-Contrast Resolution for the American College of Radiology Computed Tomographic Accreditation Program: What Is the Impact of Iterative Reconstruction?
    Kofler JM; Yu L; Leng S; Zhang Y; Li Z; Carter RE; McCollough CH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):619-23. PubMed ID: 25853774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated phantom analysis for gamma cameras and SPECT: A methodology for use in a clinical setting.
    Tazegul TE; Polemi AM; Snyder A; Snyder C; Collins PG
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 21(11):205-214. PubMed ID: 33142050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated daily quality control analysis for mammography in a multi-unit imaging center.
    Sundell VM; Mäkelä T; Meaney A; Kaasalainen T; Savolainen S
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Feb; 60(2):140-148. PubMed ID: 29768928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerized quantitative evaluation of mammographic accreditation phantom images.
    Lee Y; Tsai DY; Shinohara N
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6323-31. PubMed ID: 21302789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image-quality figure evaluator based on contrast-detail phantom in radiography.
    Wang CL; Wang CM; Chan YK; Chen RT
    Int J Med Robot; 2012 Jun; 8(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 22213357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.