These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26395611)

  • 1. Heuristic errors in clinical reasoning.
    Rylander M; Guerrasio J
    Clin Teach; 2016 Aug; 13(4):287-90. PubMed ID: 26395611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying Heuristic Bias: Anchoring, Availability, and Representativeness.
    Richie M; Josephson SA
    Teach Learn Med; 2018; 30(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 28753383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical reasoning: the relative contribution of identification, interpretation and hypothesis errors to misdiagnosis.
    Groves M; O'Rourke P; Alexander H
    Med Teach; 2003 Nov; 25(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 15369910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A mixed-methods exploration of cognitive dispositions to respond and clinical reasoning errors with multiple choice questions.
    Surry LT; Torre D; Trowbridge RL; Durning SJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):277. PubMed ID: 30470223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A follow-up study of medical students' biomedical understanding and clinical reasoning concerning the cardiovascular system.
    Ahopelto I; Mikkilä-Erdmann M; Olkinuora E; Kääpä P
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 Dec; 16(5):655-68. PubMed ID: 21384269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the use of cognitive heuristic representativeness in clinical reasoning.
    Payne VL; Crowley RS
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():571-5. PubMed ID: 18999140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning from mistakes. Factors that influence how students and residents learn from medical errors.
    Fischer MA; Mazor KM; Baril J; Alper E; DeMarco D; Pugnaire M
    J Gen Intern Med; 2006 May; 21(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 16704381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current trends in developing medical students' critical thinking abilities.
    Harasym PH; Tsai TC; Hemmati P
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Jul; 24(7):341-55. PubMed ID: 18805749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. German undergraduate medical students' attitudes and needs regarding medical errors and patient safety--a national survey in Germany.
    Kiesewetter J; Kager M; Lux R; Zwissler B; Fischer MR; Dietz I
    Med Teach; 2014 Jun; 36(6):505-10. PubMed ID: 24597660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do extended matching multiple-choice questions measure clinical reasoning?
    Beullens J; Struyf E; Van Damme B
    Med Educ; 2005 Apr; 39(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 15813764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cross-cultural study of students' approaches to professional dilemmas: sticks or ripples.
    Ho MJ; Lin CW; Chiu YT; Lingard L; Ginsburg S
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 22324524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reasoning strategies and the use of biomedical knowledge by medical students.
    Patel VL; Evans DA; Kaufman DR
    Med Educ; 1990 Mar; 24(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 2319971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Problem solving in undergraduate medical students.
    Neame RL; Mitchell KR; Feletti GI; McIntosh J
    Med Decis Making; 1985; 5(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 3837167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A functional neuroimaging study of the clinical reasoning of medical students.
    Chang HJ; Kang J; Ham BJ; Lee YM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Dec; 21(5):969-982. PubMed ID: 27230543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problem-based training for medical students reduces common prescription errors: a randomised controlled trial.
    Celebi N; Weyrich P; Riessen R; Kirchhoff K; Lammerding-Köppel M
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19769651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The 3 faces of clinical reasoning: Epistemological explorations of disparate error reduction strategies.
    Monteiro S; Norman G; Sherbino J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Jun; 24(3):666-673. PubMed ID: 29532584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring how students think: a new method combining think-aloud and concept mapping protocols.
    Pottier P; Hardouin JB; Hodges BD; Pistorius MA; Connault J; Durant C; Clairand R; Sebille V; Barrier JH; Planchon B
    Med Educ; 2010 Sep; 44(9):926-935. PubMed ID: 20716103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heuristics reasoning in diagnostic judgment.
    O'Neill ES
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 7665799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic errors and flaws in clinical reasoning: mechanisms and prevention in practice.
    Nendaz M; Perrier A
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2012; 142():w13706. PubMed ID: 23135902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Should I prioritize medical problem solving or attentive listening?": the dilemmas and challenges that medical students experience when learning to conduct consultations.
    Aper L; Veldhuijzen W; Dornan T; van de Ridder M; Koole S; Derese A; Reniers J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Jan; 98(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 25448312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.