These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26396656)

  • 1. Cartoons on bacterial balloons: scientists' opinion on the popularization of synthetic biology.
    Domínguez M; Mateu A; Torgersen H; Porcar M
    Syst Synth Biol; 2014 Dec; 8(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 26396656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.
    Braun M; Starkbaum J; Dabrock P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145033. PubMed ID: 26660160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "The chilling effect": Medical scientists' responses to audience feedback on their media appearances during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Nölleke D; Leonhardt BM; Hanusch F
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Jul; 32(5):546-560. PubMed ID: 36633310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.
    Hara N; Abbazio J; Perkins K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216789. PubMed ID: 31091264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.
    Yuan S; Besley JC; Dudo A
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 Jan; 28(1):101-118. PubMed ID: 30175667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.
    Choi S; Anderson AA; Cagle S; Long M; Kelp N
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0287870. PubMed ID: 37531388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communicating science in public controversies: Strategic considerations of the German climate scientists.
    Post S
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 24583579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.
    Dudo A; Besley JC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148867. PubMed ID: 26913869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissemination or participation? Exploring scientists' definitions and science communication goals in the Netherlands.
    Nerghes A; Mulder B; Lee JS
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277677. PubMed ID: 36454886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responding to Richard: Celebrity and (mis)representation of science.
    Johnson DR; Ecklund EH; Di D; Matthews KRW
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jul; 27(5):535-549. PubMed ID: 29956596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media's coverage of science.
    Schäfer MS
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Aug; 21(6):650-63. PubMed ID: 23832152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From science to popularization, and back--the science and journalism of the Belgian economist Gustave de Molinari.
    Van Dijck M
    Sci Context; 2008 Sep; 21(3):377-402. PubMed ID: 19244854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language and values in the human cloning debate: a web-based survey of scientists and Christian fundamentalist pastors.
    Weasel LH; Jensen E
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 16552907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientists' views about communication objectives.
    Besley JC; Dudo A; Yuan S
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Aug; 27(6):708-730. PubMed ID: 28841818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lithuanian scientists' behavior and views on science communication.
    Valinciute A
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 32126899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Burning platforms: friending social media's role in #scicomm.
    Woodgett J
    Trends Cell Biol; 2014 Oct; 24(10):555-7. PubMed ID: 25260836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A triangulated approach for understanding scientists' perceptions of public engagement with science.
    Calice MN; Bao L; Beets B; Brossard D; Scheufele DA; Feinstein NW; Heisler L; Tangen T; Handelsman J
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Apr; 32(3):389-406. PubMed ID: 36154528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How institutional factors at US land-grant universities impact scientists' public scholarship.
    Bao L; Calice MN; Brossard D; Beets B; Scheufele DA; Rose KM
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Feb; 32(2):124-142. PubMed ID: 35652301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting scientists' participation in public life.
    Besley JC; Oh SH; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 23825262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.