These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26397097)
41. Outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and laser fragmentation for treatment of large renal stones with and without the use of ureteral access sheaths: Results from a university hospital with a review of literature. Geraghty RM; Ishii H; Somani BK Scand J Urol; 2016 Jun; 50(3):216-9. PubMed ID: 27111193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Simultaneous combined use of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy to reduce the number of access tracts in the management of complex renal calculi. Marguet CG; Springhart WP; Tan YH; Patel A; Undre S; Albala DM; Preminger GM BJU Int; 2005 Nov; 96(7):1097-100. PubMed ID: 16225535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Stone-Free Rate after Treating Kidney Stones Exceeding 10 mm via Flexible Ureteroscopy: Can Endoscopic Assessment Replace Low-Dose Computed Tomography Control? Wilhelm K; Hahn O; Schoenthaler M; Hein S; Neubauer J; Schnabel M; Neisius A Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):326-330. PubMed ID: 31394535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. What is the appropriate gravel size during ureteroscopy lithotripsy? An in vitro evaluation. Song B; Jin D; Cheng Y; Wang Z; Wang F; Fang L Urolithiasis; 2023 Mar; 51(1):52. PubMed ID: 36929459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Semirigid ureteroscopy with pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral stone. Dongol UM; Acharya L; Subba K; Khambu B; Joshi R; Shrestha SK; Singh DR J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2011 Apr; 9(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 22929707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Initial Experience with the New Super Thin Single-use Pusen Flexible Ureteroscope 7.5 Fr in Renal Stones Endoscopic Treatment. Geavlete B; Ene C; Iordache V; Geavlete P Chirurgia (Bucur); 2021; 116(3):354-360. PubMed ID: 34191717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; an equally effective and a sensible alternative to flexible ureterorenoscopy in the management of large ureteral stones in terms of effectivity and cost. Günseren KÖ; Demir A; Çiçek MC; Yavaşcaoğlu İ; Kılıçarslan H Arch Esp Urol; 2021 Jul; 74(6):592-598. PubMed ID: 34219062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Treatment of ureteral calculi with semirigid ureteroscopy: where should we stop? Yencilek F; Sarica K; Erturhan S; Yagci F; Erbagci A Urol Int; 2010; 84(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 20389152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Gap between UAS and ureteroscope predicts renal stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy with the fragmentation technique. Komeya M; Odaka H; Watanabe T; Kiuchi H; Ogawa T; Yao M; Matsuzaki J World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2733-2739. PubMed ID: 32986134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10-30 mm size. Knoll T; Jessen JP; Honeck P; Wendt-Nordahl G World J Urol; 2011 Dec; 29(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 22037633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Impact of ureteric access sheath use during flexible ureteroscopy: A comparative study on efficacy and safety. Abdelfatah Zaza MM; Farouk Salim A; El-Mageed Salem TA; Mohammed Ezzat A; Hassan Ali M Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2024 Apr; 48(3):204-209. PubMed ID: 37838327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Flexible ureteroscopy for lower pole calculus: is it still a challenge? Shrestha A; Adhikari B; Panthier F; Baidya S; Gauhar V; Traxer O World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3345-3353. PubMed ID: 37728745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Flexible Ureteroscopic Management of Horseshoe Kidney Renal Calculi. Ding J; Huang Y; Gu S; Chen Y; Peng J; Bai Q; Ye M; Qi J Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(4):683-9. PubMed ID: 26401860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Impact of case volume per year on flexible Ureteroscopy practice: an internet based survey. Alhunaidi O; Ahmad AA; El-Nahas AR; Akroof B; Alamiri A; Al-Ajrawi F; Al-Terki A; El-Shazly M BMC Urol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):134. PubMed ID: 31852477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Ultra-mini PCNL versus flexible ureteroscopy: a matched analysis of analgesic consumption and treatment-related patient satisfaction in patients with renal stones 10-35 mm. Wilhelm K; Hein S; Adams F; Schlager D; Miernik A; Schoenthaler M World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):2131-6. PubMed ID: 25971205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Difference in operative time according to stone location for endoscopic management of ureteral and renal stones. Deters LA; Pais VM Urology; 2013 Mar; 81(3):522-6. PubMed ID: 23352365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Pre- and peri-operative clinical information, physiological observations and outcome measures following flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS), for the treatment of kidney stones. A single-centre observational clinical pilot-study in 51 patients. Hughes SF; Moyes AJ; Jones K; Bell C; Duckett A; Moussa A; Shergill I BMC Urol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):104. PubMed ID: 35836212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi. Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Recent advances in the treatment of renal stones using flexible ureteroscopys. He M; Dong Y; Cai W; Cai J; Xie Y; Yu M; Li C; Wen L Int J Surg; 2024 Jul; 110(7):4320-4328. PubMed ID: 38477158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]