These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26398037)

  • 21. Selective removal of arsenic and monovalent ions from brackish water reverse osmosis concentrate.
    Xu P; Capito M; Cath TY
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():885-91. PubMed ID: 23892312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of feed solution characteristics and membrane fouling on the removal of THMs by UF/NF/RO membranes.
    Fang C; Ou T; Wang X; Rui M; Chu W
    Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 260():127625. PubMed ID: 32758776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Calcium phosphate scaling during wastewater desalination on oligoamide surfaces mimicking reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes.
    Rathinam K; Oren Y; Petry W; Schwahn D; Kasher R
    Water Res; 2018 Jan; 128():217-225. PubMed ID: 29107906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
    Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
    J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Removal of the natural hormone estrone from aqueous solutions using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis.
    Schäfer AI; Nghiem LD; Waite TD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Jan; 37(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 12542309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hexavalent Chromium Removal from Model Water and Car Shock Absorber Factory Effluent by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membrane.
    Mnif A; Bejaoui I; Mouelhi M; Hamrouni B
    Int J Anal Chem; 2017; 2017():7415708. PubMed ID: 28819360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Achieving very low mercury levels in refinery wastewater by membrane filtration.
    Urgun-Demirtas M; Benda PL; Gillenwater PS; Negri MC; Xiong H; Snyder SW
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 May; 215-216():98-107. PubMed ID: 22410725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of tertiary treatment by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for water reuse in denim textile industry.
    Ben Amar N; Kechaou N; Palmeri J; Deratani A; Sghaier A
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Oct; 170(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 19497667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis potentialities to recover metals, sulfuric acid, and recycled water from acid gold mining effluent.
    Ricci BC; Ferreira CD; Marques LS; Martins SS; Amaral MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 74(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 27438241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Water recovery from yarn fabric dyeing wastewater using electrochemical oxidation and membrane processes.
    Bouchareb R; Bilici Z; Dizge N
    Water Environ Res; 2022 Jan; 94(1):e1681. PubMed ID: 35075710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Study of different pretreatments for reverse osmosis reclamation of a petrochemical secondary effluent.
    Benito-Alcázar C; Vincent-Vela MC; Gozálvez-Zafrilla JM; Lora-García J
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):883-9. PubMed ID: 20207074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nanofiltration technology in water treatment and reuse: applications and costs.
    Shahmansouri A; Bellona C
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 25714628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Treatment of hospital wastewater effluent by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis.
    Beier S; Köster S; Veltmann K; Schröder H; Pinnekamp J
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(7):1691-8. PubMed ID: 20371926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling micropollutant removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: considerations and challenges.
    Castaño Osorio S; Biesheuvel PM; Spruijt E; Dykstra JE; van der Wal A
    Water Res; 2022 Oct; 225():119130. PubMed ID: 36240724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Removal of fluoride and uranium by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: a review.
    Shen J; Schäfer A
    Chemosphere; 2014 Dec; 117():679-91. PubMed ID: 25461935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
    Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of operating conditions on the separation of ammonium and nitrate ions with nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Koyuncu I
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2002 Aug; 37(7):1347-59. PubMed ID: 15328697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Toward improved boron removal in RO by membrane modification: feasibility and challenges.
    Bernstein R; Belfer S; Freger V
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(8):3613-20. PubMed ID: 21417224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.