These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26398048)
1. Just Because It's Published Doesn't Mean It's Perfect: The Continuing Evolution of the Peer Review Process. Bartley GB; Liesegang TJ Ophthalmology; 2015 Oct; 122(10):1958-9. PubMed ID: 26398048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal. Liesegang TJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Do it right the first time: advice for cornea authors. Sugar A; Sugar J; Schwab I; Perry H; de Luise V; Soong HK; Weiss J Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):879. PubMed ID: 25062337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. What the American Journal of Ophthalmology Wants to Publish. Parrish RK; Stewart MW; Vanner EA; Duncan Powers SL Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 199():xi-xii. PubMed ID: 30685053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. If it's too good to be true, it probably is. Kennedy MS Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. JAMA Ophthalmology: it's not just a new name. Bressler NM JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Jul; 131(7):839. PubMed ID: 23846200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The perils of the least publishable unit. J Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 28(9):601-2. PubMed ID: 22947284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution. Biddle C AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process. Giles J Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review: should we modify our process? Berquist TH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rigor of peer review and the standing of a journal. Tobin MJ Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2002 Oct; 166(8):1013-4. PubMed ID: 12379538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review--reject, accept, or major revision? Lancet Neurol; 2003 Sep; 2(9):517. PubMed ID: 12941568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Spotlight on "peer-review": the noble foundation of scientific research. Bhandari S Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 19218730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]