These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26398184)
1. Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States. Shankaran V; Ortendahl JD; Purdum AG; Bolinder B; Anene AM; Sun GH; Bentley TGK Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 26398184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of FOLFIRI + cetuximab vs FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of Stintzing S; van Oostrum I; Pescott CP; Ronga P; Heeg B; Heinemann V J Med Econ; 2020 May; 23(5):448-455. PubMed ID: 31903807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Han J; Xiao D; Tan C; Zeng X; Hu H; Zeng S; Jiang Q; She L; Yao L; Li L; Tang L; Ma J; Huang J; Shen L Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820902271. PubMed ID: 32107929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model. Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial. Wang H; Huang L; Gao P; Zhu Z; Ye W; Ding H; Fang L BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030738. PubMed ID: 32051297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a post-hoc analysis of tumour dynamics in the final RAS wild-type subgroup of this randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Stintzing S; Modest DP; Rossius L; Lerch MM; von Weikersthal LF; Decker T; Kiani A; Vehling-Kaiser U; Al-Batran SE; Heintges T; Lerchenmüller C; Kahl C; Seipelt G; Kullmann F; Stauch M; Scheithauer W; Held S; Giessen-Jung C; Moehler M; Jagenburg A; Kirchner T; Jung A; Heinemann V; Lancet Oncol; 2016 Oct; 17(10):1426-1434. PubMed ID: 27575024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic evaluation study (CHEER-compliant): Cost-effectiveness analysis of RAS screening for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on the CALGB 80405 trial. Zhou J; Zhao R; Wen F; Zhang P; Tang R; Chen H; Zhang J; Li Q Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jul; 95(27):e3762. PubMed ID: 27399059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consequences of Biomarker Analysis on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab in Combination with FOLFIRI as a First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Personalised Medicine at Work. Harty G; Jarrett J; Jofre-Bonet M Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2018 Aug; 16(4):515-525. PubMed ID: 29948926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US. Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Heinemann V; von Weikersthal LF; Decker T; Kiani A; Vehling-Kaiser U; Al-Batran SE; Heintges T; Lerchenmüller C; Kahl C; Seipelt G; Kullmann F; Stauch M; Scheithauer W; Hielscher J; Scholz M; Müller S; Link H; Niederle N; Rost A; Höffkes HG; Moehler M; Lindig RU; Modest DP; Rossius L; Kirchner T; Jung A; Stintzing S Lancet Oncol; 2014 Sep; 15(10):1065-75. PubMed ID: 25088940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI for the Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Wild-Type Ras Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Shi Y; Wan X; Tan C; Li J; Peng L Adv Ther; 2020 Feb; 37(2):847-859. PubMed ID: 31902066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic Analysis of Panitumumab Compared With Cetuximab in Patients With Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer That Progressed After Standard Chemotherapy. Graham CN; Maglinte GA; Schwartzberg LS; Price TJ; Knox HN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Fakih MG Clin Ther; 2016 Jun; 38(6):1376-1391. PubMed ID: 27085587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Graham CN; Hechmati G; Fakih MG; Knox HN; Maglinte GA; Hjelmgren J; Barber B; Schwartzberg LS J Med Econ; 2015; 18(8):619-28. PubMed ID: 25822327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of RAS screening before monoclonal antibodies therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer based on FIRE3 Study. Wen F; Yang Y; Zhang P; Zhang J; Zhou J; Tang R; Chen H; Zheng H; Fu P; Li Q Cancer Biol Ther; 2015; 16(11):1577-84. PubMed ID: 26418570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial. Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ; J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting. Asseburg C; Frank M; Köhne CH; Hartmann JT; Griebsch I; Mohr A; Osowski U; Schulten J; Mittendorf T Clin Ther; 2011 Apr; 33(4):482-97. PubMed ID: 21635994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]