190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26398252)
1. Perception of hearing protectors by workers that participate in hearing preservation programs: a preliminary study.
Gonçalves CG; Lüders D; Guirado DS; Albizu EJ; Marques JM
Codas; 2015; 27(4):309-18. PubMed ID: 26398252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of knowledge and behavior toward hearing protection among workers in different workplaces and its influence factors].
Yang M; Ou ZZ; Yang M; He P; He DK; Chen HQ; Liao XQ
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 36(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 30248733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Gender and other factors associated with the use of hearing protection devices at work.
Meira TC; Santana VS; Ferrite S
Rev Saude Publica; 2015; 49():. PubMed ID: 26487294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Training on hearing protector insertion improves noise attenuation.
Samelli AG; Rocha CH; Theodósio P; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF
Codas; 2015; 27(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 26691614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
Alberti PW; Riko K
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing protector fit testing with off-shore oil-rig inspectors in Louisiana and Texas.
Murphy WJ; Themann CL; Murata TK
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):688-98. PubMed ID: 27414471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness verification of an educational program about hearing protection for noise-exposed workers.
Rocha CH; Santos LH; Moreira RR; Neves-Lobo IF; Samelli AG
J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2011 Mar; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 21552731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Analysis of verification results of protective effects of hearing protectors in different industries].
Shi HX; Su SB; Liu M; Li RZ; Wang TJ; Xiao B
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2023 May; 41(5):333-337. PubMed ID: 37248077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech recognition in noise under hearing protection: A computational study of the combined effects of hearing loss and hearing protector attenuation.
Giguère C; Berger EH
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1():S30-40. PubMed ID: 26840922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aspects on personal noise protection.
Axelsson K; Axelsson A; Jonsson A
Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 756091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.
McCullagh MC; Banerjee T; Yang JJ; Bernick J; Duffy S; Redman R
Noise Health; 2016; 18(85):368-375. PubMed ID: 27991469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of hearing protection interventions for farm operators.
McCullagh MC; Ronis DL
BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():399. PubMed ID: 25927191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting Thai workers' use of hearing protection.
Tantranont K; Srisuphan W; Kaewthummanukul T; Suthakorn W; Jormsri P; Salazar MK
AAOHN J; 2009 Nov; 57(11):455-63. PubMed ID: 19873942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fit-testing hearing protectors: an idea whose time has come.
Hager LD
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):147-51. PubMed ID: 21368440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
