These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26398416)

  • 1. How Does the Driver's Perception Reaction Time Affect the Performances of Crash Surrogate Measures?
    Kuang Y; Qu X; Weng J; Etemad-Shahidi A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138617. PubMed ID: 26398416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A tree-structured crash surrogate measure for freeways.
    Kuang Y; Qu X; Wang S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Apr; 77():137-48. PubMed ID: 25710638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing rear-end collision risk of cars and heavy vehicles on freeways using a surrogate safety measure.
    Zhao P; Lee C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():149-158. PubMed ID: 29407662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of driver's age and side of impact on crash severity along urban freeways: a mixed logit approach.
    Haleem K; Gan A
    J Safety Res; 2013 Sep; 46():67-76. PubMed ID: 23932687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of heterogeneity of car-following behavior on rear-end crash risk.
    Zhang J; Wang Y; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():275-289. PubMed ID: 30802778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting driver reaction time and deceleration: Comparison of perception-reaction thresholds and evidence accumulation framework.
    Durrani U; Lee C; Shah D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105889. PubMed ID: 33248429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crash probability estimation via quantifying driver hazard perception.
    Li Y; Zheng Y; Wang J; Kodaka K; Li K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():116-125. PubMed ID: 28595973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Presence of passengers: does it increase or reduce driver's crash potential?
    Lee C; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Sep; 40(5):1703-12. PubMed ID: 18760099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of driver's brake perception-reaction time at signalized intersections with and without countdown timer using parametric duration models.
    Fu C; Zhang Y; Bie Y; Hu L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt B):448-460. PubMed ID: 26211414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of countermeasures for red light running by traffic simulator-based surrogate safety measures.
    Lee C; So JJ; Ma J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 28636489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding the effects of vehicle platoons on crash type and severity.
    Hyun KK; Mitra SK; Jeong K; Tok A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105858. PubMed ID: 33220605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver's visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure.
    Abdel-Aty M; Abdelwahab H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 May; 36(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 15003590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of traffic states on freeway crash involvement rates.
    Yeo H; Jang K; Skabardonis A; Kang S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():713-23. PubMed ID: 22795398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety.
    Jeong E; Oh C; Lee S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():115-124. PubMed ID: 28499140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying the Accumulator model to predict driver's reaction time based on looming in approaching and braking conditions.
    Durrani U; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2023 Sep; 86():298-310. PubMed ID: 37718057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.